Debts Recovery Tribunals and Appellate Tribunals

Mr. Jaykar Vinod Patni vs STATE BANK OF INDIA on 21 January 2026

Exh-6

IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL-II AT AHMEDABAD (Pankaj Kumar Upadhyay, Presiding Officer)

Item No.04 MA/4/2026

21.01.2026

Present:

Mr. Jaykar Vinod Patni Vs. State Bank of India

Mr. Jainam Singh Rathod, Ld. Counsel for the Applicant. None appeared for the Respondent Bank.

Ld. Counsel for the Applicant has filed Pursis for withdrawal Ex.A/05, which is taken on record.

Ld. Counsel for the Applicant filed Pursis Ex.A/05, mentioning therein that *the present matter is inadvertently filed as M.A. and Interim Application is already on record. Therefore, the Applicant is seeking permission to withdraw.*

*Today the matter is come up for hearing as a fresh case. Considering the submission made by the Ld. Counsel for the Applicant that this case is an Interim Application which is inadvertently filed as M.A. by the Applicant. Looking to the facts and circumstances Applicant being master of his case is always at liberty to withdraw his case.*

Hence, the present Miscellaneous Application is disposed of as withdrawn at the request Ld. Counsel for the Applicant and on the basis of Pursis for Ex.A/05 with no order as to cost.

Order accordingly.

File be consigned to records.

(PANKAJ KUMAR UPADHYAY) PRESIDING OFFICER DRT-II, AHMEDABAD 21.01.2026

S/j.

Page 1 of 1

Loading citations and judicial treatment…

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead