Debts Recovery Tribunals and Appellate Tribunals

MR VISHNUBHAI K RABARI AND OTHERS vs IDFC BANK LIMITED on 18 February 2025

Cites 0, Cited by 0

Exh-7

<table border="1"><tr><td data-bbox="228 71 351 88">18.02.2025</td><td data-bbox="351 71 875 88">MA/17/2025</td></tr><tr><td data-bbox="228 88 351 945"><b>Present :</b></td><td data-bbox="351 88 875 945"><p>Mr. D.D. Chauhan, Ld. Counsel for the applicant<br/>Mr. L.M. Patel, Ld. Counsel for the respondent</p><p>This application is filed for condonation of delay of 81 days in filing the proposed S.A.</p><p>Before moving into argument with regard to merits of this MA, learned counsel for the applicant has requested that in this case the applicant borrower is willing to deposit all the outstanding amount with interest to the respondent bank within 15 days and the bank has no objection in this regard. Hence, this MA may be allowed and the delay in filing the SA be condoned.</p><p>He has further requested that since the respondent has scheduled e-auction of the secured property on 18.02.2025 and the applicant is willing to settle the claim of the respondent bank amicably, Registry may be directed to register the proposed SA today itself so that the SA may be disposed of today itself.</p><p>Ld. Counsel for the respondent bank has put his written remarks on the purshis Ex. A/16 with the effect that in view of undertaking to pay the entire outstanding within 15 days, respondent bank has no objection to condone the delay and dispose of this SA.</p><p>In view of the fact that on the basis of settlement the dispute between the borrower and the respondent bank is going to be settled permanently, in the interest of justice, in my opinion this MA deserves to be allowed.</p></td></tr></table>

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

**ORDER**

1. 1. MA 17/2025 is hereby allowed. Hence the delay of 81 days in filing the proposed SA is condoned.

2. 2. The Registry is directed to register SA on its original number and submit file of SA before this Tribunal today itself after lunch.

(PANKAJ KUMAR UPADHYAY) PRESIDING OFFICER DRT-II, AHMEDABAD

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead