Debts Recovery Tribunals and Appellate Tribunals
PAVAN ROADLINES AND ORS vs EDELWEISS ASSET RECONSTRUCTION CO LTD on 28 March 2025
Exh-6
28.03.2025
MA/21/2025
**PRESENT:**
Mr. Jaydeep Shukla, Id. Counsel for the applicant Mr. A.S. Panesar, Id. Counsel for the respondent Since the Id. Counsel for respondent has appeared and filed memo of appearance there is no need to issue any notice. In this case, MA is filed with a prayer to condone the delay of 27 days in filing the proposed SA. The reason for delay is being explained as the applicant's inability to procure necessary documents in this case.
Ld. Counsel for the respondent has opposed this MA on the ground of delay.
Heard both the counsels. Perused the record. In view of this Tribunal the delay is well explained. An opportunity to be heard on merits should not be denied to any party on technical ground. So this MA deserves to be allowed.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
**ORDER**
MA/21/2025 is hereby allowed. Accordingly the delay in filing proposed SA condoned. Registry is directed to do all the formalities in this regard and to register this SA and present before this Tribunal after due process.
Nair/6
**(PANKAJ KUMAR UPADHYAY)** **PRESIDING OFFICER** **DRT-II, AHMEDABAD**