Debts Recovery Tribunals and Appellate Tribunals

MS RAJPUTANA NUTURAL JUICE vs PROTIUM FINANCE LIMITED on 4 August 2025

Exh-5

<table border="1"><thead><tr><th data-bbox="241 101 404 146">04.08.2025</th><th data-bbox="404 101 891 146">MA/54/2025</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td data-bbox="241 146 404 944"><p><b>PRESENT:</b></p><p>Nair/1</p></td><td data-bbox="404 146 891 944"><p>Ms. Nazia Halwawala, Id. Proxy counsel for applicant</p><p>In this case, Id. Counsel for the applicant has moved this MA at the stage of admission with a prayer to issue notice against the respondent FI on the ground that SA No. 205/2025 was finally disposed of by this Tribunal vide order dated 28.03.2025 imposing certain conditions and prescribing a schedule for depositing of agreed amount by the applicant with the respondent FI. On that ground the respondent FI was directed not to initiate any SARFAESI action to facilitate the applicants to comply with the order dated 28.03.2025. Now it transpires that the applicant has not been able to comply with the order and now through this MA, applicant has prayed that the time schedule for depositing the amount be extended.</p><p>The order in SA/205/2025 dated 28.03.2025 was passed after hearing and with the consent of both the parties. Therefore, it was a final order disposing the SA finally. The MA cannot be said to be a review application because <del>of</del><sup>e</sup> any clerical or typographical error or any error apparent on the records has not been prayed to be removed/corrected by this MA. Rather it is filed with a prayer to change/modify direction/conditions which were imposed by the final judgement in SA.</p><div data-bbox="568 903 634 941" style="background-color: #f0f0f0; width: 66px; height: 38px; margin-top: 20px;"></div></td></tr></tbody></table>

If this MA is admitted and taken into consideration it will amount to as revision of the order dated 28.03.2025 by the same Tribunal which has passed it, which is not legally sustainable.

In the considered view of this Tribunal, this MA is not legally maintainable.

Accordingly, this MA is dismissed at the stage of admission itself.

Let the file be consigned to records.

**(PANKAJ KUMAR UPADHYAY)** **PRESIDING OFFICER** **DRT-II, AHMEDABAD**

Page 1 of 1

Loading citations and judicial treatment…

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead