Central Administrative Tribunal
Rudra Kishore Sela vs SOUTH COAST RAILWAY on 15 October 2026
OA/529/2026
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
HYDERABAD BENCH
OA/021/529/2026
HYDERABAD, this the 15th day of Oct, 2026
Hon’ble Ms. Shalini Misra, Administrative Member Rudra Kishore Sela, S/o Mallikarjuna Rao, Aged about 41 years Health & Malaria Inspector Gr.l O/o. Chief Health & Malaria Inspector, Nellore Station, Vijayawada Division, South Coast Railways, R/o. Flat No.304, Sai Shine Residency, Street No.2, Srinivasa Nagar, Mypad Road, Nellore - 524 313.
...Applicant.
(By Advocate: Mr. Kirthi Teja Kondaveeti)
Vs.
1. Union of india represented represented by its Secretary, Ministry of Railways, Governmentof India, Rail Bhawan, 1, Raisina Road, Rajpath Area, Central Secretariat, New Delhi 110 001
2. South Coast Railway represented by Its General Manager, VMRDA
Deck Building, Siripuram, Visakhapatnam, Visakhapatnam District.
3. Principal Chief Personal Officer (PCPO), South Coast Railway, Visakhapatnam, Visakhapatnam District
4. Principal Chief Medical Director (PCMD)
South Coast Railway, Vijayawada Division, Vijayawada.
5. The Divisional Railway Manager, South Coast Railway, Vijayawada Division
6. Senior Divisional Personnel Officer (SDPO) South Coast Railway, Vijayawada Division, Krishna District.
7. Chief Medical Superintendent, South Coast Railway, Vijayawada Division
8. Asst. Personnel Officer/Electrical Vijayawada Division South Coast Railway, Vijayawada, Krishna District.
9. N. Nanda Kishore, Father's name and age not known to the applicant, Health & Malaria Inspector Gr.l, O/o Chief Health &
Malaria Inspector, Ongole Station, Vijayawada Division, South Coast Railways, Prakasam District.
... Respondents.
(By Advocate: Mrs. B Gayatri Varma, Sr. CGSC)
----
A
AD
I
OA/529/2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
(As PER HON’BLE MS. SHALINI MISRA, ADMINISTRATIVE MEMBER)
By this Original Application, the applicant is seeking the following relief:
“It is therefore, prayed that this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to declare the action of the Respondents in issuing Office Order No.MED/15/2026, dated 09-06-2026 issued by the Asst. Personnel Officer/ Electrical, Vijayawada Division, South Coast Railway in so far as it relates to transferring the applicant from Nellore to Vijayawada without completion of minimum service to accommodate unofficial Respondent as wholly illegal, arbitrary, without jurisdiction and violative of Articles 14, 16 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently declare that the applicant is entitled to be continued at Nellore Station and pass such other and further orders as this Hon'ble Tribunal deems fit and proper in the circumstances of the case.”
2. Learned counsel for the parties are present.
3. When the matter was taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the applicant submitted that, since there was no stay, the applicant has joined at the new place of posting. Therefore, the O.A. has become infructuous and nothing survives for adjudication in the matter.
4. In view of the above, the O.A. is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs.
(SHALINI MISRA)
(ADMINISTRATIVE MEMBER)
/pb/
A AD I