Central Administrative Tribunal
Kamalakar vs Department of Telecommunication on 7 October 2026
OA/620/2026
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
HYDERABAD BENCH
OA/021/620/2026
HYDERABAD, this the 7th day of October, 2026
HON’BLE Mr. MANISH GARG, JUDICIAL MEMBER
HON’BLE Mr.VARUN SINDHU KUL KAUMUDI, ADMINISTRATIVE MEMBER
Kamalakar, S/o. G.Gattaiah,
Aged about 59 yrs, Occ: Causal Labour/Mazdoor, O/o The Principal General Manager, Telecom District, Karimnagar, Karimnagar District.
... Applicant
(By Advocate: Ms. G. Uma Rani)
Vs.
1. The Union of India Rep.by its Secretary, Department of Communications, New Delhi -110001.
2. The Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd Rep.by its Director General, New Delhi-110001.
3. The Chief General Manager,
Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd, Hyderabad.500001.
4. The General Manager, Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd., Karimnagar, Karimnagar District.
… Respondents
(By Advocate: Mrs. B. Gayatri Varma, Sr. CGSC
Mrs. P. Sarada, SC for BSNL)
g
y
g
y
DN: C=IN, O=Central Administrative Tribunal, OU=Central Administrative Tribunal Hyderabad Bench, PostalCode=500004, L=Hyderabad, S=Telangana, STREET="No. 05-10-193, 1st Floor, HACA Bhavan, Saifabad, Hyderabad", Phone=12d84631fad4985ed436f8e9bed43bf11c66dc25e028e9218a4d1d0fb79d7fe3, SERIALNUMBER=b9e3d3951b505950304a85c817eadedfffbcf53466121ac580715b2596ee45c4, E=
padmavvathi23@gmail.com, CN=PADMAVATHI CHODAVARAPU
Reason: I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Location:
Date: 2026.10.08 11:51:25-08'00'
PADMAVATHI CHODAVARAPU
OA/620/2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
(As per Hon’ble Mr. Manish Garg, Judicial Member)
Despite being granted two opportunities, the applicant's counsel has not filed an application seeking condonation of delay. Even on the last date of hearing, we refrained from passing an order and granted a last opportunity to file the application for condonation of delay. However, the said application has not been filed till today.
2. In the first call, there was no representation on behalf of the applicant. Even in the second call, the applicant remained unrepresented. This indicates that the applicant has lost interest in prosecuting the matter. Therefore, the O.A. is dismissed for non-prosecution. Pending M.A.s, if any, stand disposed of. No order as to costs.
(VARUN SINDHU KUL KAUMUDI) (MANISH GARG) ADMINISTRATIVE MEMBER JUDICIAL MEMBER
/pv/ g y g y DN: C=IN, O=Central Administrative Tribunal, OU=Central Administrative Tribunal Hyderabad Bench, PostalCode=500004, L=Hyderabad, S=Telangana, STREET="No. 05-10-193, 1st Floor, HACA Bhavan, Saifabad, Hyderabad", Phone=12d84631fad4985ed436f8e9bed43bf11c66dc25e028e9218a4d1d0fb79d7fe3, SERIALNUMBER=b9e3d3951b505950304a85c817eadedfffbcf53466121ac580715b2596ee45c4, E= padmavvathi23@gmail.com, CN=PADMAVATHI CHODAVARAPU Reason: I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Location: Date: 2026.10.08 11:51:25-08'00' PADMAVATHI CHODAVARAPU