Debts Recovery Tribunals and Appellate Tribunals
Suman Rakesh Goyal vs State Bank of Hyderabad on 9 September 2025
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Exh-13
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL-II AT AHMEDABAD (Pankaj Kumar Upadhyay, Presiding Officer)
Item No.22 MA/46/2013 in R.P.No.10/2013
Smt. Suman Rakesh Goyal Vs. State Bank of India
09.09.2025
Present:
Mr.N.R.Parikh, Ld. Counsel for the Applicant.
Mr.Mohan Solanki, Ld. Counsel for the Respondent Bank.
*Pursis Ex.R/12*, filed by Respondent taken on record.
The present Miscellaneous Application has been filed by Applicant before this Tribunal in R.P.No.10 of 2013. However, during the pendency of above Miscellaneous Application, dispute has been settled between the parties and *Respondent has filed purshis Ex.R/12 stating therein that the captioned matter has been settled and the Respondent has withdrawn R.P.No.10 of 2013 on 22.03.2021 and that as no cause of action survives to the Applicant in present MA, it may be disposed of as having become infructuous.*
Ld. Counsel for the Applicant has made endorsement that he has no objection if the above Miscellaneous Application is disposed of as the above matter has been settled between the parties.
In view of the above submissions of Ld. Counsel for both the parties and contents of *purshis Ex.R/12*, as no cause of action survive to the Applicant in present MA due to settlement between the parties, *the above MA deserves to be disposed of. Hence, this case is dismissed as having become infructuous, with no order as to cost.*
Order accordingly.
File be consigned to records.
(PANKAJ KUMAR UPADHYAY) PRESIDING OFFICER DRT-II, AHMEDABAD 09.09.2025