Debts Recovery Tribunals and Appellate Tribunals

Kotak Mahindra Bank Ltd. vs M/s. Satyam Builders & ors. on 13 March 2024

Cites 0, Cited by 0

**IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL-II AT AHMEDABAD**

(Laxman Madnani, Presiding Officer)

M.A.No.57 of 2015

Date of Filing : 21.07.2015

Date of Decision : 13.03.2024

**KOTAK MAHINDRA BANK LTD.,**

.....APPLICANT

**VERSUS**

**SATYAM BUILDERS**

.....RESPONDENT

**Appearance:**

Ms.J.N.Raval, Ld. Counsel appeared for the Applicant None present for the Respondent

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

**ORDER**

1. 1. Today, this matter has come up for hearing on withdrawal affidavit Ex.A/9 filed today by the Applicant.

2. 2. Ld. Counsel for the Applicant has filed withdrawal affidavit at Ex.A/9, submitting *inter alia* that during pendency of the present matter, Respondent has given OTS proposal of Rs.55.00 Lakhs, which has been accepted by the Applicant and as per the said OTS terms and condition, Respondent has paid an amount of Rs.55.00 Lakhs towards full and final settlement. Further, that the Applicant has also issued No-Dues Certificate issued by the Applicant is annexed along with affidavit Ex.A/9. As such, it is submitted that in view of the said settlement arrived at between the parties, appropriate orders may be passed.

3. 3. Matter called several times, none present for the Respondent.

4. 4. Considering the submissions made by the Ld. Counsel for the Applicant that the Applicant wants to withdraw the captioned Misc. Application, therefore, in the interest of justice, this Tribunal is inclined to accept the submission of the Applicant to dispose of the present M.A.

5. 5. In view of the aforesaid discussion and without commenting on the merits of the case, present M.A. No.57/2015 stands dismissed as withdrawn along with all pending applications, if any, with no order as to cost.

6. 6. File be consigned to records.

(LAXMAN MADNANI) Presiding Officer, DRT-II, Ahmedabad

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead