Debts Recovery Tribunals and Appellate Tribunals
MRS SAJANBEN JORSHANGBHAI PARMAR AND ANR vs STATE BANK OF INDIA on 11 June 2024
11.06.2024
Item No.10 M.A. No.23/2024
Present:
None present for the Applicants when the matter was called out.
Perusal of the record reveals that the Applicants have filed a withdrawal purshis on 06.05.2024, which is taken on record as Ex.A/5.
It is submitted that the matter has been settled between the parties and Respondent/FI has received settlement amount and accordingly, Respondent/FI has also handed over papers to Applicants. As such, it is submitted that no cause remains to continue with the captioned SA and that appropriate order may be passed to withdraw the matter.
Heard and perused.
In view of the contents of the withdrawal purshis filed at Ex.A/5, that the matter has been settled between the parties, the present Misc Application deserves to be disposed off as withdrawn, with no order as to cost.
Order accordingly.
However, before parting with this case, it may be observed that the above Misc. Application was filed before this Tribunal on 10.08.2023 and objections have been removed on 22.04.2024, but no date of scrutiny has been mentioned in it and further no order sheet has been drawn by Ld. Registrar pointing out as to when the scrutiny was done and how many opportunities were given to the Applicants to remove objections.
Registry is directed to be careful in future and no such mistake should occur in future. Scrutiny should be done by Official concerned within the stipulated period of time as provided under Rule 5 of DRT Procedure Rules, 1993.
File be consigned to records.
(ANIL KUMAR GUPTA) I/c.PRESIDING OFFICER DRT-II, AHMEDABAD
Page 1 of 1
Loading citations and judicial treatment…