Debts Recovery Tribunals and Appellate Tribunals

MS BRK FOODS PVT LTD vs BANK OF BARODA on 5 February 2024

CONTD. ORDER.SHEET PAGE No CASE No DATE M 3124 05t071234 REMARK DESCRIPTION OF THE ORDER Counsel for Appticant Shri Umang Goyel, Advocate Respondent-Bank by Shri Udit Maindiretta, Advocate Counsel for Appticant submitted that Respondent' Bank has comptied with att the directions of this Tribunat passed in SA2O7 123 and he does not wish to proceed with the present lr1A. The counsel for appticant further prays for withdrawal of the present MA. Counsel for Respondent-Bank has got no objection' ln view of the fact that the Respondent-Bank has already comptied with the directions of this Tribunal and the Appticant does not wish to proceed with the present MA, the present lvlA stands disposed of as withdrawn. Record be consig ned to record room. (Ra s atet) Presiding officer

Page 1 of 1

Loading citations and judicial treatment…

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead