Debts Recovery Tribunals and Appellate Tribunals
SURESH PAL vs CORPORATION BANK on 16 June 2022
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
CONTD. ORDER-SHEET CASE No DATE MA 171 / 19 16/06t77 REMARK None for the Appticants Shri Sanjeev Dubey, Adv for Respondent Respondent Counsel apprised the Bench that this A{A has become infrustous and also submits that the appticants have fited this /v1A for setting aside ex-parte judgment dated 19107 /19 but as per ex-parte judgment recovery proceeding has been initiated but thereafter matter has been settled between the parties before the National Lok Adatat on 14105/72 therefore no cause of action is left for hearing on this lvlA further. Respondent Counsel has atso fited copy of the award in RC No.687/19 corporation Bank v/s Suresh Pa[ since the appticants are absent, tooking to submission and on perusal of the record, award submitted by the Respondent Counsel it reveats that the matter has settted therefore this matter is disposed of as infrustous. PAGE No. DESCRIPTION OF THE ORDER (Ram Niwas Patel) Presiding officer