Debts Recovery Tribunals and Appellate Tribunals
STATE BANK OF INDIA vs MRS DEEPTI GUPTA on 21 December 2022
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
CONTD. ORDER-SHEET
PAGE No.....
CASE No.....
<table border="1"><thead><tr><th data-bbox="68 111 164 136">DATE</th><th data-bbox="164 111 708 136">DESCRIPTION OF THE ORDER</th><th data-bbox="708 111 934 136">REMARK</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td data-bbox="28 156 131 196">RA 7/18<br/>21/12/22</td><td data-bbox="178 171 681 238">Miss Akshita Mohilay, Adv and Shri Vedant Agrawal, Adv for the Applicant<br/>None for the Non-Applicant</td><td data-bbox="711 171 931 238"></td></tr><tr><td data-bbox="28 258 131 368"></td><td data-bbox="178 258 681 368">On matter being taken Applicant Counsel submits copy of affidavit filed along with withdrawal application earlier and also copy of statement of account which is taken on record.</td><td data-bbox="711 258 931 368"></td></tr><tr><td data-bbox="28 388 131 498"></td><td data-bbox="178 388 681 498">Though on last date of hearing original OA was called but as court master apprised that the called OA could not be placed before the Bench for perusal.</td><td data-bbox="711 388 931 498"></td></tr><tr><td data-bbox="28 518 131 648"></td><td data-bbox="178 518 681 648">Since today Applicant side has placed copy of affidavit for perusal now there is no need to peruse the original OA.<br/><br/>On document submitted, Applicant Counsel heard.</td><td data-bbox="711 518 931 648"></td></tr><tr><td data-bbox="28 668 131 958"></td><td data-bbox="178 668 681 958">On perusal of application for review it reveals that the Applicant side seeks clarification about the order dated 25/05/18 passed under OA No.726/17 submitted that as per withdrawal affidavit the Bank Officer of the Applicant Bank under the affidavit has stated that after depositing Rs.25 Lac by the defendants loan account of the defendants has become regular but due to typographical error during passing order dated 25/05/18 there is mentioned that dispute is resolved as full and final settlement which is not intention of the withdrawal affidavit.</td><td data-bbox="711 668 931 958"></td></tr></tbody></table>
CONTD. ORDER-SHEET
PAGE No.....
CASE No.....
<table border="1"><thead><tr><th data-bbox="71 155 168 181">DATE</th><th data-bbox="171 155 776 181">DESCRIPTION OF THE ORDER</th><th data-bbox="779 155 1000 181">REMARK</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td data-bbox="71 184 168 968"></td><td data-bbox="171 184 776 968"><p>Looking to copy of affidavit submitted earlier with withdrawal application this review application is allowed. It is made clear that the Applicant Bank has withdrawn the OA No.726/17 with this fact that after depositing Rs.25 Lac by the defendants account No.33661360897 of the defendants has become regular.</p><p>Accordingly review petition is being disposed of.</p><p>Record be consigned to the record room.</p><p style="text-align: center;"><br/>(Ram Niwas Patel)<br/><u>Presiding Officer</u><br/>D.R.T, Jabalpur<br/>(M.P & C.G)</p></td><td data-bbox="779 184 1000 968"></td></tr></tbody></table>