Debts Recovery Tribunals and Appellate Tribunals
YATI TRIPATHI vs CANARA BANK on 31 March 2021
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL LUCKNOW Counsel for the applicant BH of Mrs. Anupama Singhai Counsel for the respondent-bank BH of Mr. Praveen Chaturvedi Counsel for the respondent-bank files reply. Copy served. Counsel for the applicant has filed this M.A. to challenge the order under Section l4 of the Act. He further submits that the applicant is willing to pay the dues of the bank, but need sometime for the same. In rebuttal, counsel for the respondent-bank submits that the applicant has not deposited any amount to show his bonafide, therefore, M.A. filed by the applicant may be dismissed. Heard counsel for both the parties and perused the record. Since, the applicant had failed to comply with the order dated.13.03.2020 passed by the Tribunal, hence, the applicant is not entitled for aly relief, therefore, M.A. filed by the applicant is dismissed'9&'. Let the file be consigned to record. 't\ - C. > ,.y / (A.H. Khan) Presiding Ofhcer Present: A.H. Khan, Presiding Offrcer Dated of order 31.03.2021 M.A. No.20 of 2021 SL No.01 (Jabalpur) Present:-