SHRI SATYENDRA SINGH vs CENTRAL MADHYA PRADESH GRAMIN BANK on 1 May 2019

CONTD. ORDER.SHEET DATE PAGE No CASE No REMARK MA26n6 0t/05/19 P I d I a o It 2t th de di Th be a b I DESCRIPTION OF THE ORDER Shri.Akshat Agarwal, Adv. for the applicant. Shri.Avnish Yadav, Adv. for the respondents. The present MA has been filed by the applicant on !:^-t^0-n_rifine for setting aside the exparte Judgment .18-02-16 (annex.A-1) passed in OA2t8/13. - The maln contention of the CounseI for the cant s that rhe appIIcant did not recel e any notice oA filed by respondent bank before DRT Jabalpur s turther contended that the pub Ication ofnottce was e in newspaper published from Gwalior whereas appI cant S reSIding ln Bhind hich Is far away GwalIor Duly considered submissions. Record of OA 13 was also summoned. Perusal of records reveals notices were duly sent by registered post to both ts and thereafter paper publication was also in newspaper. Therefore there is no reason to elieve that the applicants were not served properly. ground raised by the applicant does not appear to easonable and cannot be accepted. In the event, the present MA stands dismissed devoid of merits and substance. Record be consigned to record room. (B K. Sinha) P iding Officer I