M S BAGMAL AJIT KUMAR JAIN AND OTHERS vs BANK OF BARODA on 19 July 2019

1.. p a J h R ORDE THE OF N to PT RI s E c D Pr: Shri. Nasir Ahmad, Adv. for the Applicants Smt. Yamini Chaturvedi, Adv. for the Respdt No-l None for Respondent No.-2 DM Matter has been taken up on the basis of urgent earing application filed by applicant. Counsel for Applicant submits that the Applicant ends to deposit the entire outstanding for which fi e he needs 4 months time and prays for cation of order dated 24106/19 passed in SA 08/19. Reply has been filed by the Bank today which is on record. It is seen that the Applicant has challenged the ymbolic Possession Notice and the order passed by the M in the SA 308/19 which was disposed of vide order d 24106/19 on merits. The present MA has been led seeking some time for making payments and the licants pray for stay of the order passed by DM. en t}re earlier SA has already been disposed of on erits, I am of the opinion that any such plea regarding on any ground whatsoever can only be heard in a sh SA subject to its maintainability and not by fication of order passed in previous SA. case, the Applicants have some plans of making the ayment, they may approach the bank with the and the Bank may consider the same as per ailable guidelines and a sympathetic view may be as it is being pleaded by the Applicant Shri Ajit , who is present in person, that it is due to death of daughter that he went into depression and suffered e pecuniary loss. With these observations, the present $A stands ed of. Record be consigned to record ro hK. inha) Iding Officer