Debts Recovery Tribunals and Appellate Tribunals
UCO BANK vs RAJEEV PANDYA on 31 August 2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
<table border="1"> <tr> <td data-bbox="125 98 248 188">31.08.2026</td> <td data-bbox="253 98 313 188">Exh.</td> <td data-bbox="318 98 813 188"> <u>Before Presiding Officer Sreekala Suresh,</u><br/> <u>DRT-1, Mumbai.</u><br/> <u>Roznama in TA 699 OF 2023</u><br/> <u>Uco Bank Vs Rajeev Pandya Pandya</u> </td> <td data-bbox="818 98 954 188">Next date</td> </tr> <tr> <td data-bbox="125 193 248 600">Sr. No.24</td> <td data-bbox="253 193 313 600"></td>
<p>Applicant absent.</p> <p>Respondent absent.</p> <p>Both sides absent. No representation.</p> <p>Applicant absent on 18.02.2025, 12.06.2025, 19.09.2025, 25.08.2026 and today without representation. No positive action taken by the applicant till date. So the TA No.699 of 2023 stands dismissed for want of proper representation or steps by the applicant.</p> <p>File be closed and consigned to the record room.</p> <div style="text-align: right;"> <br/> P.O.<br/> DRT-I </div> </td>
<p>Closed</p> </td> </tr> </table>