Armed Forces Tribunal

Sukhwinder Singh vs Union of India on 16 October 2026

ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH CHANDIGARH

AT CHANDIMANDIR

-.-

OA 915 of 2026

Friday, the 16th day of October, 2026

CORAM:

HON’BLE MR JUSTICE UMESH CHANDRA SHARMA, MEMBER (J)

HON’BLE LT. GEN (DR) RANBIR SINGH, MEMBER (A)

Sukhwinder Singh

…… Applicant

(By NS Bhatti, Advocate)

Versus

Union of India and others

…… Respondents

(By JS Lalli, DSGI through VC)

-.-

ORDER

The present case has been filed by the applicant under Section 14 of the Armed Forces Tribunal Act, 2007 for setting aside the impugned order of recovery of Rs.6,16,474/- (Annexure A-2) and for directions to the respondents to refund the aforesaid amount along with interest @8% per annum.

Heard learned counsel for the applicant and perused the objection.

According to the learned counsel for the applicant a representation dated 04.05.2026 has not been answered as yet. Six months have not been passed.

In view of the above, learned counsel for the respondent No.4 is directed to decide the applicant’s representation dated 04.05.2026 by passing a speaking order within three months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order by the learned counsel for the respondents/OIC Legal cell.

(Lt. Gen (Dr) Ranbir Singh)

(Justice Umesh Chandra Sharma) Member (A)

Member (J) 16th Oct, 2026 ‘MK’

Page 1 of 1

Loading citations and judicial treatment…

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead