Debts Recovery Tribunals and Appellate Tribunals

ICICI BANK LIMITED vs SACHIN CHAVAN on 17 January 2024

Cites 0, Cited by 0

Registered on: 05.11.2015

Decided on: 17.01.2024

IN THE DEBT RECOVERY TRIBUNAL-I AT MUMBAI

TRANSFER ORIGINAL APPLICATION NO. 220 of 2016

(OA No. 717/2015 is Transferred from DRT-III, Mumbai &

Registered as TOA No. 220/2016)

ICICI BANK LIMITED, Having its registered office at: Landmark, Race Course Circle, Vadodara- 390007 and inter alia a branch office at: ICICI Bank Towers, South Towers, 4th Floor, Bandra Kurla Complex, Bandra East, Mumbai 400 051.

…. APPLICANT

VERSUS

1. MR. SACHIN UTTAM CHAVAN An

Adult Residing at Room No. 22, Shivnath

Sheth Chawl, GP Road, Ghatkopar W,

Mumbai 400 086.

2. MR.

UTTAM

RAMCHANDRA

CHAWAN An Adult Residing at Room

No. 2, Shivnath Chouthi Murari Chawl

Parsiwadi, Ghatkopar W, Mumbai 400

086.

… DEFENDANTS

____________________________________________

Counsel for the Applicant : Advocate Indrajeet Deshmukh i/b Vidhi Partners Counsel for the Defendant : Already Ex-parte

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

J U D G M E N T

1. The Original Application has been filed by the Applicant against the Defendants before Ld. DRT-III, Mumbai, which stands transferred to this Tribunal as per the Govt. Notification dated 26/09/2016 and registered as TA No. 220/2016. The OA has been filed by the Applicant for recovery of Rs. 13,54,615 (Rupees Thirteen Lakh Fifty Four Thousand Six Hundred Fifteen Only) with further interest @ 24 % p.a. from the date of filing the present OA till its realisation.

2. Facts as succinctly set out in the present OA/TA are that sometime on 28.06.2013, Defendant approached the Applicant for credit facility for the purpose of purchasing commercial vehicles as a Service Provider. Pursuant to the said request, Applicant granted an amount of Rs. 12,75,000/- to the Defendant.

3. In consideration of sanction the vehicle loan, the Defendant secured the said loan by executing Certificate of Registration issued by the Regional Transport Officer & Irrevocable Power of Attorney in favour of the Applicant.

4. In order to further secure the aforesaid loan, Defendants executed the deed of hypothecation & Guarantors executed deed of guarantee in favour of the Applicant.

5. However, after availing the aforesaid facility, the Defendant failed to make payments, thus, the account was classified as NPA on 31.05.2014. Thereafter, the Applicant was constrained to recall the aforesaid facility vide its notice dated 31.05.2014 in respect of the credit facilities. Hence, the present OA has been filed.

6. Notice was issued to the Defendants. Despite service, none appeared for the Defendant No. 1 & 2 nor filed the WS thus, they were proceeded ex-parte vide order dated 13.06.2017.

7. The Applicant Bank has produced all the Original Loan documents and other relevant documents along with their Claim Affidavit filed on 02.06.2022 through Manager Amol Shirsath.

8. I have heard the Ld. Counsel for the Applicant Bank and perused the record.

9. The witness of the Applicant Bank has fully corroborated the averments made in the OA, even otherwise the whole case of the Applicant Bank is based on documents and the witness has duly proved all these documents as against the defendants. In my view there is no question of disbelieving the evidence led by the Applicant Bank and the Applicant Bank has proved its case beyond reasonable doubt. The liability of Defendant No. 1 & 2 is joint and several.

10. In view of the submission made herein above the Original Application filed by the Applicant Bank deserves to be allowed against the Defendant No. 1 & 2.

O R D E R

(i) I allow the present O.A. and direct the Defendant No. 1 & 2, to pay to the Applicant, jointly and severally, within a period of 60 days, a sum of Rs. 13,54,615 (Rupees Thirteen Lakh Fifty Four Thousand Six Hundred Fifteen Only) with further interest @ 24 % p.a. from the date of filing the present OA till its realisation.

(ii) Failing which the aforesaid amount shall be recovered from the sale of hypothecated assets, immoveable assets as well as other personal moveable and of the Defendants.

(iii) Defendants are hereby directed not to deal with their properties till further direction of Ld. Recovery Officer.

(iv) Defendants shall also pay the cost and expenses of the OA.

(v) Recovery Certificate be issued forthwith and be sent to the Recovery Officer of this Tribunal. Copy of this order be sent to the parties as per rules. File be consigned to record.

Place: Mumbai.

(Dr. Rekha G. Dhakar) Date : 17.01.2024

Presiding Officer, DRT-1, Mumbai.

Tjs/-

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead