Debts Recovery Tribunals and Appellate Tribunals

PUNJAB NATIONAL BANK vs M/S CM BUILDING PVT LTD on 18 October 2023

Cites 0, Cited by 0

Registered on : 21.12.2015

Decided on : 18.10.2023

IN THE DEBT RECOVERY TRIBUNAL-I AT MUMBAI

TRANSFER APPLICATION NO. 959 of 2016

PUNJAB NATIONAL BANK, having its

Head Office at 7, Bhikhaiji Cama Place, New Delhi 110607 and also among other Branches haing one its branch office Asset Recovery Management Branch Office at PNB Pragati Tower, 1st Floor, Plot No C-9, Block-G, Bandra Kurla Complex, Bandra (East), Mumbai- 400051, represented by its manager Shri Vilas More.

...APPLICANT

VERSUS

1.

M/S.

CM

BUILDTECH

PVT.

LTD.,

(BORROWER/MORTGAGOR/CORPORATE

GUARANTOR) having its registered office at; Flat No.7, Pushp Varkha CHS S. V. Road, Khar Mumbai 400 052 and also having address at Katai Village Near Katai Octroi Naka Kalyan Shil Road Dombivali (E), Dist-Thane 421201.

2. MRS. POONAM SHAH, (Director &

Guarantor), having its address at 602, SONAM

120 ft. New Link Road, Kandar Pada Dahisar (W) Mumbai 400 101

3. MR. RAJESH TRIPATHI, (Director &

Guarantor), having its address at E-1/31/C-8

Sahyog CHS Sector – 10, Nerul (W) Navi

Mumbai 400705.

...DEFENDANT

________________________________________________________________

Counsel for the Applicant : Advocate Pooja Kharat i/b Law Focus.

Counsel for the Defendant : None

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

J U D G M E N T

1. The present OA has been filed by the Applicant for recovery Rs.5,50,80,780.87/- (Rupees Five Crores Fifty Lakhs Eighty Thousand Seven Hundred Eighty and paisa Eighty Seven only) as on 09.07.2015 together with the interest at the rate of 14.50% p.a. (compounding) with monthly rests and penal interest 2% (simple) from the date of filing of the present OA till its realization.

2. Facts as succinctly set out in the OA are that the Defendant No.1 approached the Applicant for a cash credit facility of Rs. 750 lakhs, which was sanctioned by the Applicant vide its sanction letter dated 22.06.2012.

3. In consideration of sanction the said Cash Credit Facility, the Defendants executed the following loaning and Security Document:-

a. Deed of Hypothecation of Goods and Book Debts dated 21.07.2012.

b. Deed of Hypothecation of Moveable Assets forming part of Fixed/Block Assets dated 21.07.2012.

c. Agreement of Guarantee dated 21.07.2012 executed by Defendant No.2 & 3;

d. Letter of Deposit of Title Deeds with an intention to create equitable mortgage of Flat No. 203, 2nd floor of Maria Salisbury Park at 82, Pali Hill, Bandra West, Mumbai 400050 dated 21.07.2012. The fact of creation of mortgage is confirmed by Defendant No.1 by their letter dated 29.07.2012. The Applicant has also vide their letter dated 30.07.2012 acknowledged creation of mortgage by Defendant No.1

4. It is further stated that the Applicant has registered their charge of Mortgage in the office of Registrar of Companies, Mumbai on 29.07.2012.

5. It is further stated that in order to recover the outstanding loan amount, the Applicant sold the said mortgaged property under the provisions of SARFAESI Act and realized an amount of Rs.4,57,92,500/- which was credited to the loan account after deducting and appropriating other bank charges. The balance amount of Rs.5,50,80,780.87 is to be recovered from the Defendants.

6. It is further stated that since the Defendants failed to regularize the accounts thus, the account was classified as NPA w.e.f. 30.09.2013. Thereafter, the Applicant issued notice under Section 13(2) of the SARFAESI Act, 2002 dated 12.10.2013 thereby recalling the credit facility and invoking the guarantees on 12.10.2013 and wilful defaulter notice dated 23.12.2013. Further, recall loan was issued by the Applicant on 13.06.2015 and called upon the Defendants to clear the outstanding dues but they failed to pay the dues. Hence, the present OA has been filed. .

7. Notices were issued to the Defendants. Defendants put their appearance through counsel however, despite opportunities, no WS has been filed by the Defendants. Record reveals that after 23.02.2018 no one appeared for the Defendants.

8. The Applicant Bank has produced all the Original Loan documents and other relevant documents along with their Claim Affidavit filed through the Senior Manager Mr. Vilas More.

9. I have heard the Ld. Counsel for the Applicant Bank and perused the record.

10. The witness of the Applicant Bank has fully corroborated the averments made in the TA, even otherwise the whole case of the Applicant is based on documents and the witness has duly proved all these documents as against the Defendants. In my view there is no question of disbelieving the evidence led by the Applicant Bank and the Applicant Bank has proved its case beyond reasonable doubt. The liability of Defendant No.1 to 3 is joint and several.

11. In the light of above discussions, the Transfer Original Application deserves to be allowed against the Defendant No.1 to 3.

O R D E R

(i) I allow the present OA and direct the Defendant No.1 to 3 to pay to the Applicant Bank, jointly and severally, within a period of 60 days, a sum of Rs.5,50,80,780.87/- (Rupees Five Crores Fifty Lakhs Eighty Thousand Seven Hundred Eighty and paisa Eighty Seven only) together with interest at the rate of 14.50% p.a. with monthly rests and penal interest 2% from the date of filing of the present OA till its realization.

(ii) Failing which the aforesaid amount shall be recovered from the sale of the personal moveable and immoveable assets of the Defendants.

(iii) Defendants are hereby directed not to deal with their properties till further direction of Ld. Recovery Officer.

(iv) Defendants shall also pay the cost and expenses of the TA.

(v) Recovery Certificate be issued forthwith and be sent to the Recovery Officer of this Tribunal. Copy of this order be sent to the parties as per rules. File be consigned to record.

Place: Mumbai.

(Dr. Rekha G. Dhakar) Date : 18.10.2023

Presiding Officer, DRT-1, Mumbai SP/-

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead