Debts Recovery Tribunals and Appellate Tribunals
ALLAHABAD BANK vs RUBBER CRAFT on 20 August 2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
20.08.2026 Exh Roznama-MDRT-II M.A. No.21 of 2026 Next date
Mr Rajesh Nagori a/w Ms Tejasvi Dalvi, Advocates for the Applicant. None for Respondent.
The Applicant has preferred this Misc. Application for Condonation of delay of days in filing Application for restoration of O.A. No.507 of 2024. Ld. Advocate for the Applicant submitted that the O.A. was filed to recover the amount of Rs.4,67,90,872/- from Defendants as on 28.09.2016. On 17.07.2025, the Applicant has got the knowledge that the matter is dismissed. The brief was also not traceable. That on 20.08.2025, a reminder email was sent to the Bank to provide copy of O.A. if available with the Bank. In November, the instructions had come for taking the certified copy of the impugned Order is applied on 15.11.2025 and the same was delivered on 24.11.2025. Ld. Advocate further submitted that O.A. was registered on 19.04.2024 and matter has come on board on 28.08.2024 and the same was adjourned to 12.11.2024 before
Registrar and issued summons on same date and further adjourned to 07.03.2025. On 07.03.2025, none appeared the matter was placed on dismissal board on 21.04.2024. Since nobody appeared, the matter got dismissed on 17.07.2025. The status of the matter was not uploaded on the site and keeping check daily on board wsa impossible. The Applicant came to know that on 17.07.2025, the O.A. has been dismissed, when the Applicant wanted to apply for return of original documents since the mortgaged property was sold. The O.A. got declined but the same is unintentional and due to bonafide reasons and circumstances beyond the control of the Applicant. The Applicant has also filed claim affidavit and list of documents to take recovery from the defendants. Therefore, the Applicant filed the present M.A. No.21 of 2026 to restore the O.A. and the O.A. be taken up for hearing in accordance with due process of law. Respondent is already set ex-parte vide order dated 11.08.2026. Heard, considered the arguments and
Srishti -17 perused the record. That reason and ground prima-facie appears satisfactory in the absence of any objection. Hence, in the above facts and circumstances of the case, M.A. No.21 of 2026 is allowed subject to cost of Rs.2,500/- payable to DRT Bar Association, Mumbai for purchase of books and periodicals. Original Application No.507 of 2024 be restored after due procedure. File be consigned to the record room after due compliance.
Sd/- P.O. DRT-II
Closed