Gujarat High Court
SCA/3303/1992 of PRIYAKANT THAKORLAL MUNSHA Vs THE STATE OF GUJARAT on 21 December 1999
HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No 3303 of 1992 For Approval and Signature: Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE KUNDAN SINGH ============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : NO to see the judgements? - 2. To be referred
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No 3303 of 1992
For Approval and Signature:
Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE KUNDAN SINGH
============================================================
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : NO
to see the judgements? -
2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? - : 3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy : NO of the judgement? - 4. Whether this case involves a substantial question : NO of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder? - 5. Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge? : NO - -------------------------------------------------------------- PRIYAKANT THAKORLAL MUNSHAVersus STATE OF GUJARAT -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: MR SH SANJANWALA for Petitioners MR LR PUJARI AGP for Respondents No. 1 to 3 MR NAGARKAR WITH SN SHELAT Addl. Advocate General, for Respondent No. 4.
-------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : MR.JUSTICE KUNDAN SINGH
Date of decision: 21/12/1999
ORAL JUDGEMENT
Learned counsel for the parties appeared and made a statement that possession of the land in dispute has not been taken by the authority concerned under the Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976 and hence the proceedings of this petition abate.
2. In the result, the proceedings of this petition abate in view of the Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation)
Repeal Act, 1999. Accordingly, this petition is dismissed.
3. Rule is discharged with no order as to costs.
Interim relief granted earlier by this Court stands vacated.
���-0-0-0-0-0-
/JVSatwara/