Debts Recovery Tribunals and Appellate Tribunals
UNION BANK OF INDIA vs Dcon India Construction on 30 April 2024
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL No.2, MUMBAI
(BEFORE HON’BLE PRESIDING OFFICER)
Sr. No.9
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
In MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION NO.53 of 2024
Union Bank of India … Applicant Versus Dcon India Construction … Respondent
Mr Anchit Ojha, Mr R.K. Dubey and Ms Jyoti Tiwari i/b M/s. Annand Singh & Asso. – Advocates for the applicant. None for respondent.
Shri Deepak M. Thakkar Presiding Officer, 30th April 2024.
ORDER
1. The applicant requests the Tribunal to direct the learned Registrar to return the original documents tendered in evidence along with the CAOD. It is stated that on 1st April 2024, the Tribunal allowed the applicant to withdraw the Original Application as settled. Request accepted.
2. Miscellaneous Application No.53 of 2024 is allowed with no order as to costs.
Sd/- (Deepak M. Thakkar)
DRT-2, Mumbai Radhika
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL No.2, MUMBAI (BEFORE HON’BLE PRESIDING OFFICER) ORDER SHEET
30.04.2024 Sr. No.9 MA No.53 of 2024 classifi -cation No. of Exh. Union Bank of India Vs. Dcon India Construction
Mr Anchit Ojha, Mr R.K. Dubey and Ms Jyoti Tiwari i/b M/s. Annand Singh & Asso. – Advocates for the applicant. None for respondent.
1. Order in Miscellaneous Application No.53 of 2024 passed separately.
2. The learned Registrar is directed to return the original documents to the applicant as per the Rules.
Sd/-
DRT-2, Mumbai Radhika