Debts Recovery Tribunals and Appellate Tribunals
BANK OF BARODA vs M/s. Hanjer Fibres Ltd on 4 August 2023
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL No.2, MUMBAI
(BEFORE HON’BLE PRESIDING OFFICER)
Sr. No.5
INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION No.1717 of 2023
In
MISCELLENEOUS APPLICATION
NO.159 of 2017
Bank of Baroda
… Applicant
Versus
M/s. Hanjer Fibres Ltd. & Ors.
… Respondents
Mr Sachin Satpute i/b M/s. Satpute & Co. – Advocates for the applicant.
Mr Puneet Gogad – Advocate for respondents.
Shri Deepak M. Thakkar
Presiding Officer,
4th August 2023.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
1. It is the applicant’s case that this Tribunal has no jurisdiction to issue a Recovery Certificate issued under Section 84 of the Multistate Co-operative Societies Act. The learned counsel requests the Tribunal to return the original award. Permission to withdraw the Miscellaneous Application is granted.
2. By consent, Interlocutory Application No.1717 of 2023 is allowed with no order as to costs.
Sd/- (Deepak M. Thakkar)
DRT-2, Mumbai Radhika
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL No.2, MUMBAI (BEFORE HON’BLE PRESIDING OFFICER) ORDER SHEET
04.08.2023 Sr. No.5 MA No.159 of 2017 classifi- cation No. of Exh. Bank of Baroda
Vs M/s. Hanjer Fibres Ltd. & Ors.
11 Mr Sachin Satpute i/b M/s. Satpute & Co. – Advocates for the applicant. Mr Puneet Gogad – Advocate for respondents.
1. The learned counsel for the applicant has presented I.A. No.1717 of 2023 supported by affidavit (exhibit- 11), which is taken on record.
2. Order in Interlocutory Application No.1717 of 2023 passed separately.
3. In view of the order passed in I.A. No.1717 of 2023, Miscellaneous Application No.159 of 2017 stands dismissed as withdrawn with no order as to costs.
4. The learned Registrar is directed to return the award to the applicant. The applicant may avail the remedy of approaching the Court of competent jurisdiction as per Law.
Sd/-
DRT-2, Mumbai Radhika