Debts Recovery Tribunals and Appellate Tribunals
ICICI BANK LIMITED vs SANTOSH KUMAR DUBEY on 8 August 2023
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL No.2, MUMBAI
(BEFORE HON’BLE PRESIDING OFFICER)
Sr. No.9
INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION No.1598 of 2023
In
TRANSFERRED ORIGINAL APPLICATION
NO.106 of 2023
ICICI Bank Ltd.
… Applicant
Versus
Santosh Kumar Debey & Anr.
… Defendants
Mr Advait Hattangadi i/b M/s. Raval-Shah & Co. – Advocates for the applicant.
None for defendants.
Shri Deepak M. Thakkar
Presiding Officer,
8th August 2023.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
1. The parties have amicably settled the matter for the amount in the sum of Rs.7,50,000/- as set out in the application. The applicant also requests for refund of the court fees as set out in paragraph 8. Mr Hattangadi requests the Tribunal to grant permission to withdraw the Original Application. Permission granted.
2. Interlocutory Application No.1598 of 2023 is allowed with no order as to costs.
Sd/- (Deepak M. Thakkar)
DRT-2, Mumbai Radhika
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL No.2, MUMBAI (BEFORE HON’BLE PRESIDING OFFICER) ORDER SHEET
08.08.2023 Sr. No.9 TOA No.106 of 2023 classifi -cation No. of Exh. ICICI Bank Ltd. Vs. Santosh Kumar Debey & Anr.
Mr Advait Hattangadi i/b M/s. Raval-Shah & Co. – Advocates for the applicant. None for defendants.
1. Order in I.A. No.1598 of 2023 passed separately.
2. In view of the order passed in I.A. No.1598 of 2023, Transferred Original Application No.106 of 2023 stands dismissed as withdrawn with no order as to costs.
3. The learned Registrar is directed (i) to return the original documents and (ii) to refund the court fees as per the Rules.
Sd/-
DRT-2, Mumbai Radhika