Debts Recovery Tribunals and Appellate Tribunals

INDIAN OVERSEAS BANK vs CHOKSI ENERGY on 14 August 2023

Cites 0, Cited by 0

IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL No.2, MUMBAI

(BEFORE HON’BLE PRESIDING OFFICER)

Sr. No.8

INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION (Exhibit-6)

In

CHAMBER APPEAL

NO.6 of 2023

Indian Overseas Bank

… Appellant

Versus

M/s.

Choksi

Energy

and

Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. & Ors.

… Respondents

Mr Raj Dani i/b M/s. Thodur Law Associates – Advocates for the appellant.

None for respondents.

Shri Deepak M. Thakkar

Presiding Officer,

14th August 2023.

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

1. The appellant has filed the Interlocutory Application to set aside the order dated 19th June 2023 passed by the learned Registrar and restore the Original Application for the purpose of registration. His request is accepted. The appellant has also moved I.A. (exhibit-6) seeking the Tribunal’s permission to withdraw the Original Application. The appellant seeks the Tribunal’s permission to withdraw the Original Application as the cause of action is changed and has placed reliance on the order dated 18th January 2023 passed by the Hon’ble Bombay High Court in Writ Petition No.5022 of 2022.

Permission to withdraw is granted. The appellant also requests the Tribunal to refund the court fess as per the Rules.

2. Interlocutory Application (exhibit-6) is allowed with no order as to costs.

Sd/- (Deepak M. Thakkar) Presiding Officer, DRT-2, Mumbai Nidhi

IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL No.2, MUMBAI (BEFORE HON’BLE PRESIDING OFFICER) ORDER SHEET

14.08.2023 Sr. No.8 Chamber Appeal No.6 of 2023 classifi -cation No. of Exh. Indian Overseas Bank Vs. M/s. Choksi Energy and Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. & Ors. Mr Raj Dani i/b M/s. Thodur Law Associates – Advocates for the appellant. None for respondents.

1. The learned counsel for the appellant has presented I.A. (exhibit-6) supported by affidavit (exhibit-7), which is taken on record.

2. Order in I.A. (exhibit-6) passed separately.

3. In view of the order passed in I.A. (exhibit-6), Chamber Appeal No.6 of 2023 stands disposed of with no order as to costs so also Original Application stands disposed of with no costs.

4. The learned Registrar is directed (i) register the O.A. as per the Rules (ii) refund the court fees as per the Rules.

Sd/-

DRT-2, Mumbai Nidhi

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead