Debts Recovery Tribunals and Appellate Tribunals
UNION BANK OF INDIA vs RAHUL IMPEX on 6 October 2023
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL No.2, MUMBAI
(BEFORE HON’BLE PRESIDING OFFICER)
Sr. No.4
INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION No.1838 of 2023
In
ORIGINAL APPLICATION
NO.1482 of 2016
Union Bank of India
… Applicant
Versus
Rahul Impex
… Defendant
Ms Mable Soans i/b M/s. Mable & Asso. – Advocates for the applicant.
None for defendant.
Shri Deepak M. Thakkar
Presiding Officer,
6th October 2023.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
1. The parties have amicably settled the matter for an amount in the sum of Rs.13 lakhs as set out in the application. Ms Soans, representing the applicant submits that the court fee has been debited to the borrower’s account and does not press for the refund of the court fees. The learned counsel seeks permission to withdraw the Original Application. Permission granted.
2. Interlocutory Application No.1838 of 2023 is allowed with no order as to costs.
Sd/- (Deepak M. Thakkar)
DRT-2, Mumbai Nidhi
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL No.2, MUMBAI (BEFORE HON’BLE PRESIDING OFFICER) ORDER SHEET
06.10.2023 Sr. No.4 OA No.1482 of 2016 classifi -cation No. of Exh. Union Bank of India Vs. Rahul Impex Ms Mable Soans i/b M/s. Mable & Asso. – Advocates for the applicant. None for defendant.
1. Order in I.A. No.1838 of 2023 passed separately.
2. In view of the order passed in I.A. No.1838 of 2023, O.A. No.1482 of 2016 stands dismissed as withdrawn with no order as to costs.
3. The learned Registrar is directed to return the original documents as per the Rules.
Sd/-
DRT-2, Mumbai Nidhi