Debts Recovery Tribunals and Appellate Tribunals

STATE BANK OF INDIA vs SUNIL R SHAH on 11 February 2021

Cites 0, Cited by 0

IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL No.2, MUMBAI

(BEFORE HON’BLE PRESIDING OFFICER)

(THROUGH VIDEO CONFERENCE)

ORDER SHEET

Sr. No.6

Classifi

cation

No.

of

Exh.

INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION No.239 of 2021

In

ORIGINAL APPLICATION

No.1025 of 2016

State Bank of India

… Applicant.

Versus

Mr Sunil R. Shah & Ors.

… Defendants.

Ms Asmita Maurya i/b Mr Vivek V. Sawant – Advocate for the applicant.

Ms Sanjana Ghogare – Advocate for defendant no.1 to 3.

Shri Deepak M. Thakkar

11th February, 2021.

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

1. The learned counsel for defendant submits that the Securitization Application No.101 of 2017 is listed tomorrow for withdrawal and she has no objection for the applicant to withdraw the Original Application as the matter has been amicably settled between the parties.

2. Ms Sanjana Ghogare, the learned counsel for defendant nos.1 to 3, submits that the defendants made the payment

in the sum of ₹23,33,253.40 in full and final satisfaction of the applicant’s claim.

3. By consent of the parties, the applicant is allowed with no order as to costs.

Sd/- (Deepak M. Thakkar)

D.R.T.No.2, Mumbai Sagar

IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL No.2, MUMBAI (BEFORE HON’BLE PRESIDING OFFICER) (THROUGH VIDEO CONFERENCE) ORDER SHEET

11.02.2021 Sr. No.6 OA No.1025 of 2016 classifi- cation No. of Exh.

Ms Asmita Maurya i/b Mr Vivek V. Sawant – Advocate for the applicant. Ms Sanjana Ghogare – Advocate for defendant no.1 to 3.

1. Order in Interlocutory Application No.239 of 2021 passed separately.

2. In view of the order passed in Interlocutory Application No.239 of 2021, Original Application No.1025 of 2016 stands disposed of with no order as to costs.

3. The Registrar is directed to refund the court fees as per the Rules.

Sd/-

D.R.T.No.2, Mumbai Sagar

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead