Debts Recovery Tribunals and Appellate Tribunals
BANK OF BARODA (DENA BANK) vs MRS GEETABAI SAMPAT NATHE on 5 March 2019
k
Presented on : 11/02/2015
Registered on : 16/12/2015
Transferred on : 03/10/2016
Decided on : 05/03/2019
Duration : 19(D)/02(M)/03(Y)
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL - III AT MUMBAI
DATED THIS 5th DAY OF MARCH 2019
PRESENT : SHRI. T S ASOKRAJ
PRESIDING OFFICER
T 0 A No. 1518 of 2016
Dena Bank, a body corporate constituted under )
Banking Companies (Acquisition and Transfer of )
Undertaking) Act 1970 having its Head Office at Dena)
Corporate Centre, C-10, "G" Block, Bandra -Kurla )
Complex, Bandra (East), Mumbai-400 051 and one of )
its Branch office situate at Renuka Plaza, near GPO, )
Tryambak Road, Bhadrakali, Nashik City - 422 001 )
through Asst. General Manager
VERSUS
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Mrs. Geetabai Sampat Nathe, Post : Pade, Tal : Dindori, Dist Nashik - 422 202
2. Mr. Kailas Gopal Nathe, Post : Pade, Tal : Dindori, Dist Nashik - 422 202
3. Mr. Ramesh Gangadhar Nathe, Post : Pade, Tal : Dindori, Dist Nashik - 422 202 ) ) Applicant Defendant No. 1 Defendant No. 2 Defendant No. 3 Present : Ms. Rekha Nair, Advocate, Counsel for Applicant Bank Defendants remained ex-parte This Original Application (OA) is filed by Applicant under Section 19 of the Recovery of Debts Due to Banks and Financial Institutions Act, 1993 ("RDDB Act") (since changed to "Recovery of Debts and Bankruptcy Act, 1993") against the Defendants for the recovery of a sum aggregating to Rs. 21,83,571/- (Rupees Twenty One lacs Eighty Three thousand Five hundred and Seventy One only) in respect of the various credit facilities mentioned in the OA alongwith cost, charges, pendente lite future interest as stated therein from the date of filing of this OA till its realisation.
Parties : Applicant is a Bank within Sec. 2(d) of the RDDB Act and lender of credit facilities to Defendant No. 1.Defendant No. 2 and 3 provided additional security by way of personal guarantee for the credit facilities. Factual matrix :
1. (a) As per OA, at the request of Defendant No. 1, Applicant provided credit facilities aggregating to Rs. 10,30,000/- comprising of Term Loan of Rs. 8,00,000/- ("TL") and Crop Loan of Rs. 2,30,000/- ("CL") (TL and CL are collectively called "Credit Facilities") to Defendant No. 1 based on the documentation and security creation by Defendant No. 1. Defendant No. 2 and 3 provided additional security of guarantee.
(b) Defendant No. 1 also provided mortgage security for the Credit Facilities by executing Declaration under Sec. 5 of Maharashtra Provision of Facilities for Agricultural Credit by Bank Act, 1974 in respect of his agricultural lands located in Post - Pade, Taluk Dindori, District Nashik, and got the same registered with SRO, Dindori. The Declaration was also registered in the 7 / 12 Register under Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966.
(c) According to the OA, Defendant No. 1 was not regular in repaying the Credit Facilities and failed and neglected to make payment of principal amount, interest and other monies in respect of the Credit Facilities as and when the same fell due. It is further averred that the Defendant No. 1 also committed defaults in observance and performance of the terms and conditions of the Credit Facilities. Applicant issued Recall Notice to all the Defendants, calling upon them to repay the entire outstanding amount of the Credit Facilities. On the failure of the Defendants to repay, the OA has been filed.
2. (a)Tribunal, after satisfying itself of the OA being within limitation and falling within its territorial jurisdiction as per RDDB Act, ordered issue of Summons to Defendants.
(b) Transfer Notices to the Defendants were sent by Registered Post with Acknowledgement Due, which got served. Applicant filed Service Affidavit to that effect.
(c) As the Defendants did not appear either in person or through advocate and file Written Statements, the Defendants were set ex-parte on 06/07/2018 by an Order of the Tribunal. Proceedings :
3. As directed by the Tribunal, Applicant filed, through Shri. Raliu1 M Girase, Manager, Claim Affidavit enclosing various Documents as Annexures (which have been taken on record by the Tribunal and marked as "Exhibits") and also filed Certified Statement of Account together with the Certificate issued under Information Technology Act, 2000 and Certificates under Bankers Books of Evidence Act, 1891, as Annexures (which are marked as Exhibit "21", "23" & "24"). Of the Documents filed as Exhibits and gone through by the Tribunal, the following are found relevant for the Tribunal to consider and dispose of the OA on merit. S. No. Facility Document Exhibit
1.
2. Term Loan Rs. 8,00,000/-) Crop Loan Rs. 2,30,000/-) Loan Proposal and Branch Manager's Report (Office Copy) "14"
D P Note for TL (Original) "15"
D P Note for CL (Original) "16"
Hypothecation Agreement (Original) "17"
Personal Guarantee of Def 2 & 3 (Original) "18"
Mortgage thro Declaration by Def 1 (Regd with SRO, Dindori) (Original) with 7 / 12 Extract "19"
Recall Notice (Office Copy) "20"
Observation on Evidences provided& Claim made :
4. The Statement of Account filed by the Applicant, certified as per Bankers Books of Evidence Act, 1891, tallied with claim in OA. Further, the case of the Applicant is based on various Documents (including the above referred Exhibits) filed alongwith Claim Affidavit, which is a sworn Statement, which has gone unchallenged. In my view, there is no question of disbelieving the Exhibits and Claim Affidavit and other evidences let in by the Applicant and the Applicant has proved its case beyond reasonable doubt to the extent of sanctioning the Credit Facilities, completing Documentation and disbursement of the Credit Facilities.
5. The Applicant has claimed interest at the rate of 13.75% p.a. with yearly rests for both the facilities from the date of filing of the OA till its realisation. Having regards to Sec. 19(20) of the RDDB Act (which is analogous to Sec. 34 of Civil Procedure Code, 1908) the contract between the Applicant and Defendants comes to an end on the filing of the OA.Thus the Tribunal has discretion in awarding pendente lite and future interest. Considering the rate of interest charged by banks for similar facilities, I am of the opinion that interest of justice will be served if the rate interest is awarded at the rate of 12.00% p.a. on simple interest basis.
6. In the light of above discussions, the Original Application is being allowed and Order passed on the following terms.
ORDER
(i) This Original Application is allowed with costs and decree to be issued on the terms set out below;
(ii) There shall be a Decree in favour of the Applicant as under -
(a) For Rs. 17,23,457/- (Rupees Seventeen lacs Twenty Three thousand Four hundred and Fifty Seven only) alongwith future interest at the rate of 12.00% per annum (on simple interest basis) from the date of filing of the Original Application till the date of realisation in respect of Term Loan ("Decreed Amount for TL"); (b) For Rs. 4,60,114/- (Rupees Four lacs Sixty thousand One hundred and Fourteen only) alongwith future interest at the rate of 12.00%,per annum (on simple interest basis) from the date of filing of `the Original Application till the date of realisation in respect of Crop Loan('Decreed Amount for CL");
(iii) Defendant No. 1, the Borrower, Defendant No. 2 and 3, the Guarantors, are ordered to pay, jointly and severally, to the Applicant, within a period of 30 days, the Decreed Amount for TL and, in the event of the said Defendants failing to pay and discharge the dues as directed or in the event of shortfall, the assets forming security for the Term Loan (covered by Exh "17" being the moveable assets charged & Exh "19" being the immoveable properties mortgaged) be attached / taken possession of and be sold to the extent of realising the dues / shortfall, as the case may be, and in the event of further shortfall, the said Defendants be proceeded against personally by way of personal decree and business assets / personal assets / estates of Defendant No. 1 and personal assets / estates of Defendant No. 2 and 3 be attached and sold for realising the dues / shortfall, as the case may be;
(iv) Defendant No. 1, the Borrower, Defendant No. 2 and 3, the Guarantors, are ordered to pay, jointly and severally, to the Applicant, within a period of 30 days, the Decreed Amount for CL and, in the event of the said Defendants failing to pay and discharge the dues as directed or in the event of shortfall, the assets forming security for the Crop Loan (covered by Exh "17" being the moveable assets charged & Exh "19" being the immoveable properties mortgaged) be attached / taken possession of and be sold to the extent of realising the dues / shortfall, as the case may be, and in the event of further shortfall, the said Defendants be proceeded against personally by way of personal decree and business assets / personal assets / estates of Defendant No. 1 and personal assets / estates of Defendant No. 2 and 3 be attached and sold for realising the dues / shortfall, as the case may be;
(v) Based on the Original Documents placed before this Tribunal, supported by the pleadings, it is Declared that there is a valid, subsisting and enforceable mortgage over the immoveable properties described in Exh "19" in favour of the Applicant validly securing the Term Loan and Crop Loan;
(vi) Based on the Original Documents placed before this Tribunal, supported by the pleadings, it is Declared that there is a valid, subsisting and enforceable joint and several personal guarantee of Defendant No. 2 and 3 being Exh "18" in favour of the Applicant validly securing the Term Loan and Crop Loan;
(vii) Defendant No. 1 to 3 are directed to declare, on oath, to the Recovery Officer, Debts Recovery Tribunal - III, Mumbai, both moveable and immoveable assets of theirs as, also Defendant No. 1 is directed to declare, on oath, both moveable and immoveable assets of the business carried on by him for the purpose of attachment and sale as directed under Clause (iii) and / or Clause (iv) above;
(viii) Defendant No. 1 to 3 are injuncted from dealing with the assets described in Exh "17" and Exh "19" as also assets declared on oath as per Clause (vii) above in any manner whatsoever till the complete recovery of Decreed Amounts under Clause (ii) above;
(ix) Recovery Certificates be issued forthwith as per above decrees and sent to the Recovery Officer, Debts Recovery Tribunal - III, Mumbai;
(x) Parties are directed to appear before the Recovery Officer, Debts Recovery Tribunal - III, Mumbai;
(xi) Copies of final order be sent to all concerned free of cost and File be consigned to records. T S As aj, Presiding Officer, Debts Recovery Tribunal - III, Mumbai. (Pronounced in open Court) Dated : 5th March 2019