Debts Recovery Tribunals and Appellate Tribunals
PUNJAB NATIONAL BANK vs KONDAJI KHANDERAO VASAL on 20 March 2019
• 1;-2___
Presented on : 16/06/2015
Registered on : 17/08/2016
Transferred on : 03/10/2016
Decided on : 20/03/2019
Duration :03(D)/07(M)/02(Y)
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL - III AT MUMBAI
DATED THIS 20thDAY OF MARCH 2019
PRESENT : SHRI. T S ASOKRAJ
PRESIDING OFFICER
T 0 A No. 2080 of 2016
Oriental Bank of Commerce,a body corporate under )
Banking Companies (Acquisition and Transfer of )
Undertaking) Act 1970 having its Corporate Office at )
Plot No. 5, Sector 32, Institutional Area, Gurgaon - )
122001 and its Branch Office amongst other at Nashik,)
Situate at Prestige Point, Opp Vasant Market, Canada )
Corner, Nashik 422 005through Branch Manager ) ... Applicant
VERSUS
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Kondaji Khanderao Vasal, Post : Avankhed, Tal : Dindori, Dt : Nashik-422202) ... Defendant No. 1
2. Balasaheb Namdev Pingal, Post : Avankhed, Tal : Dindori,Dt : Nashik-422202) ... Defendant No. 2 Present: Shri. Ajikumar, Advocate, i/b M/s VNA Legal, Counsel for Applicant Bank Defendants remained ex-parte This Original Application (OA) is filed by Applicant under Section 19 of the Recovery of Debts Due to Banks and Financial Institutions Act, 1993 ("RDDB Act") (since changed to "Recovery of Debts and Bankruptcy Act, 1993") against the Defendants for the recovery of a sum aggregating to Rs. 46,60,653/- (Rupees Forty Six lacs Sixty thousand Six hundred and Fifty Three only) in respect of the various credit facilities mentioned in the OA alongwith cost, charges, pendente lite future interest as stated therein from the date of filing of this OA till its realisation.
Parties : Applicant is a Bank within Sec. 2(d) of the RDDB Act and lender of credit facilities to Defendant No. 1. Defendant No. 1 and 2 are individuals with Defendant No. 1 availing credit facilities from the Applicant for which Defendant No. 2 stood personal guarantee by way of additional security. Factual matrix :
1. (a) As per OA, Defendant No. 1 availed from the Applicant Term Loan of Rs. 16,74,000/- ("TL") and Crop Loan (under Oriental Green Card Scheme - "OGC Scheme") of Rs. 6,88,000/- ("CL") (TL and CL are collectively called "Credit Facilities") based on the documentation and security creation by him and the additional security of personal guarantee provided by Defendant No.
2. Defendant No. 1 created mortgage security for the Credit Facilities on his agricultural lands located in Village Avankhed, TalukDindori, District Nashik, by executingDeed of Mortgage and getting the same registered with SRO, Dindori. Besides 2 vehicles acquired by the Defendant No. 1 out of the TL were hypothecated / charged to Applicant and the same got endorsed in the Registration Certificates of the Vehicles.
(b) At the request of Defendant No. 1, Applicant rescheduled the overdue Instalments of the TL and restructured the outstanding CL into Restructured Term Loan ("RTL") and Applicant executed appropriate Agreements for Rescheduled / Restructured Credit Facilities accepting the restructuring and rescheduling and the terms and conditions thereof.
(c) As per OA, Defendant No. 1 made some initial payments but thereafter failed and neglected to make any further repayments / payments resulting in the accounts of the Credit Facilities getting classified as Non-Performing Assets. Applicant issued Legal Notice calling upon the Defendants to repay the entire outstanding amount of the Credit Facilities and, on their failure to repay, the OA has been filed.
2. (a)Tribunal, after satisfying itself of the OA being within limitation and falling within its territorial jurisdiction as per RDDB Act, ordered issue of Summons to Defendants, which was served on the Defendants.
(b) On transfer of the OA to this Tribunal, Summons to the Defendants were sent by Registered Post with Acknowledgement Due. The postal covers got served on the respective Defendants and Acknowledgement Due Cards received back.
(c) As Defendants did not appear either in person or through advocate and file Written Statements, the Defendants were set ex-parte on 23/10/2017 by an Order of the Tribunal. Proceedings :
3. As directed by the Tribunal, Applicant filed, through Shri. Sapan Azad Therval, Chief Manager, Claim Affidavit enclosing various Documents as Annexures (which have been taken on record by the Tribunal and marked as "Exhibits") and also filed Certified Statement of Account together with the Certificates under Bankers Books of Evidence Act, 1891, as Annexures (which are marked as Exhibit "27", "28", "29"& "30"). Of the Documents filed as Exhibits and gone through by the Tribunal, the following are found relevant for the Tribunal to consider and dispose of the OA on merit. S. No. Facility Document Exhibit
1.
2. Term Loan (Rs. 16,74,000/ -) Crop Loan (Rs. 6,88,000/ -) Since converted to Restructured Term Loan ("RTL") Sanction Letter (Office Copy) "11"
Agreement of Term Loan (also creates charge on the moveable fixed assets) (Original) "12"
Agreement for Hypothecation of crops, etc. as security for Crop Loan (Original) "13"
Deed of Mortgage by Def 1 Regd with SRO, Dindori (Original) "15"
Personal Guarantee of Def
(Original) "16" Agreement for Rescheduling TL (Orl) "21"
Agreement for Rescheduling TL and Restructuring CL into RTL (Orl) "22"
Regn Certificate of Tractor with Applicant name endorsed (photocopy) "24"
Regn Certificate of Tractor with Applicant name endorsed (photocopy) "25"
Recall Notice (Office Copy) "26"
Observation on Evidences provided& Claim made :
4. The Statement of Account filed by the Applicant, certified as per Bankers Books of Evidence Act, 1891, tallied with claim in OA. Further, the case of the Applicant is based on various Documents (including the above referred Exhibits) filed alongwith Claim Affidavit, which is a sworn Statement, which has gone unchallenged. In my view, there is no question of disbelieving the Exhibits and Claim Affidavit and other evidences let in by the Applicant and the Applicant has proved its case beyond reasonable doubt to the extent of sanctioning the Credit Facilities, completing Documentation and disbursement of the Credit Facilities.
5. The Applicant has claimed interest at the rate of 14.75% p.a. with yearly rests for both TL and RTL bothfrom the date of filing of the OA till its realisation. Having regards to Sec. 19(20) of the RDDB Act (which is analogous to Sec. 34 of Civil Procedure Code, 1908) the contract between the Applicant and Defendants comes to an end on the filing of the OA. Thus the Tribunal has discretion in awarding pendente lite and future interest. Considering the rate of interest charged by banks for similar facilities, I am of the opinion that interest of justice will be served if the rate interest is awarded at the rate of 12.00% p.a. on simple interest basis for both the facilities.
6. In the light of above discussions, the Original Application is being allowed and Order passed on the following terms.
ORDER
(i) This Original Application is allowed with costs and decree to be issued on the terms set out below;
(ii) There shall be a Decree in favour of the Applicant as under - (a) For Rs. 33,85,585/- (Rupees Thirty Three lacs Eighty Five thousand Five hundred and Eighty Five only) alongwith future interest at the rate of 12.00% per annum (on, simple interest basis) from the date of filing of the Original Application till the date of realisation in respect of Term Loan ("Decreed Amount for TL"); (b) For Rs. 12,75,068/- (Rupees Twelve lacs Seventy Five thousand and Sixty Eight only) alongwith future interest at the rate of 12.00% per annum (on simple interest basis) from the date of filing of the Original Application till the date of realisation in respect of Crop Loan ("CL") since converted to RestructuredTerm Loan ("Decreed Amount for RTL");
(iii) Defendant No. 1, the Borrower, and Defendant No. 2, the Guarantor, are ordered to pay, jointly and severally, to the Applicant, within a period of 30 days, the Decreed Amount for TL and, in the event of the said Defendants failing to pay and discharge the dues as directed or in the event of shortfall, the assets forming security for the Term Loan (covered by Exh "12" being the moveable assets charged, Exh "24"& "25" being Vehicles hypothecated &Exh "15" being the immoveable properties mortgaged) be attached / taken possession of and be sold to the extent of realising the dues / shortfall, as the case may be, and in the event of further shortfall, the said Defendants be proceeded against personally by way of personal decree and business assets / personal assets / estates of Defendant No. 1 and personal assets / estates of Defendant No. 2 be attached and sold for realising the dues / shortfall, as the case may be;
(iv) Defendant No. 1, the Borrower, and Defendant No. 2, the Guarantor, are ordered to pay, jointly and severally, to the Applicant, within a period of 30 days, the Decreed Amountfor RTL and, in the event of the said. Defendants failing to pay and discharge the dues as directed or in the event of shOttfall, the assets forming security for the Restructured Term Loan (arising out of conversion of Crop Loan) (covered by Exh "13" being the moveable assets charged & Exh "15" being the immoveable properties mortgaged) be attached / taken possession of and be sold to the extent of realising the dues / shortfall, as the case may be, and in the event of further shortfall, the said Defendants be proceeded against personally by way of personal decree and business assets / personal assets / estates of Defendant No. 1 and personal assets / estates of Defendant No. 2 be attached and sold for realising the dues / shortfall, as the case may be;
(v) Based on the Original Documents placed before this Tribunal, supported by the hypothecation / charge on the moveable assets of the Defendant No. 1, the Borrower, as per Exh "12", "24"& "25" in favour of the Applicant validly securing the Term Loan;
(vi) Based on the Original Documents placed before this Tribunal, supported by the pleadings, it is Declared that there is a valid, subsisting and enforceable hypothecation / charge on the moveable assets of the Defendant No. 1, the Borrower, as per Exh "13" in favour of the Applicant validly securing the Restructured Term Loan (arising out of conversion of Crop Loan);
(xii) Copies of final order be sent to all concerned free of cost and File be consigned to records. T S Asokraj, Presiding Officer, Debts Recovery Tribunal - III, Mumbai.
(vii) Based on the Original Documents placed before this Tribunal, supported by the pleadings, it is Declared that there is a valid, subsisting and enforceable mortgage over the immoveable properties described in Exh "15" in favour of the Applicant validly securing the Term Loan and Restructured Term Loan (arising out of conversion of Crop Loan);
(viii) Defendant No. 1 and 2are directed to declare, on oath, to the Recovery Officer, Debts Recovery Tribunal - III, Mumbai, both moveable and immoveable assets of theirs as also Defendant No. 1 is directed to declare, on oath, both moveable and immoveable assets of the business carried on by him for the purpose of attachment and sale as directed under Clause (iii) and / or Clause (iv) above; Defendant No. 1 and 2are injuncted from dealing with the assets described in Exh "12", "13", "24" & "25" and Exh "15" as also assets declared on oath as per Clause (viii) above in any manner whatsoever till the complete recovery of Decreed Amounts under Clause (ii) above;
(x) Recovery Certificates be issued forthwith as per above decrees and sent to the Recovery Officer, Debts Recovery Tribunal - III, Mumbai;
(xi) Parties are directed to appear before the Recovery Officer, Debts Recovery Tribunal - III, Mumbai; (Pronounced in open Court) Dated : 20th March 2019