Debts Recovery Tribunals and Appellate Tribunals
SANJAY S/O BHAURAO DESHMUKH vs INDIAN OVERSEAS BANK on 2 January 2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Page 1 of 2 M.A. No. 09/2025
**BEFORE THE HON'BLE PRESIDING OFFICER, DRT, NAGPUR**
**M.A. No. 09/2025**
**Sanjay B. Deshmukh & Others Vs. Indian Overseas Bank Ltd.**
**Sr. No. 2 (UR)**
<table border="1"> <thead> <tr> <th data-bbox="131 201 248 236">Date</th> <th data-bbox="251 201 311 236">Exh. No.</th> <th data-bbox="314 201 771 236">Roznama Order</th> <th data-bbox="774 201 889 236">Next Date</th> </tr> </thead> <tbody> <tr> <td data-bbox="131 239 248 859">02.01.2026</td> <td data-bbox="251 239 311 859"></td> <td data-bbox="314 239 771 859"> <p><b><u>HEARING THROUGH HYBRID MODE</u></b></p> <p>The Ld. Counsel for both sides are present.</p> <p>The Ld. Counsel for respondent has filed a pursis enclosing therewith the photocopy of FIR registered as Pusad PS Case No. 668/2025. The same has been noted by Ld. Counsel for applicants.</p> <p><b><u>M.A. No. 09/2025</u></b></p> <p>Heard both sides.</p> <p>The Ld. Counsel for applicants has submitted that S.A. could not be filed within stipulated period <i>due to ignorance of the</i> and they could know about the action of respondent only after issuance of possession notice <i>(dated 21/11/25)</i>. As such, the delay of 62 days in filing S.A. may be condoned.</p> <p>The same has been opposed by the Ld. Counsel for respondent, who has submitted that no cogent reason has been assigned for condoning the delay. As such, the same may not be allowed.</p> <p>Considering the submissions of both sides and material placed on record, the delay in filing S.A. is hereby condoned in the interest of justice. Registry is directed to register the S.A., if otherwise in order.</p> </td> <td data-bbox="774 239 889 859"></td> </tr> </tbody> </table>
**Contd.**
Page 2 of 2 M.A. No. 09/2025
<table border="1"><tr><td data-bbox="111 81 233 232"><u>Contd.</u><br/><b>02.01.2026</b></td><td data-bbox="233 81 753 232"><p>Put up for filing reply to S.A. by respondent,<br/>hearing on I.A. No. 1007/2025 and status of case<br/>pending before the 2<sup>nd</sup> Jt. CJJD & JMFC, Pusad<br/>in RCS No. 171/2024 on --</p><p style="text-align: right;"><br/>(Pankaj Kumar)<br/>Presiding Officer,<br/>DRT, Nagpur.</p></td><td data-bbox="753 81 870 232"><b>12.01.2026</b></td></tr></table>
VIKAS