Debts Recovery Tribunals and Appellate Tribunals

AU SMALL FINANCE BANK LIMITED vs MS LAXMI AGENCIES on 20 January 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

**BEFORE THE HON'BLE PRESIDING OFFICER, DRT, NAGPUR**

**CA No.04/2025**

**Sr. No.02**

<table border="1"><thead><tr><th data-bbox="125 178 241 211">Date</th><th data-bbox="241 178 301 211">Exh. No.</th><th data-bbox="301 178 756 211"><u>Roznama Order</u></th><th data-bbox="756 178 885 211">Next date</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td data-bbox="125 211 241 900">20.01.2026</td><td data-bbox="241 211 301 900"></td><td data-bbox="301 211 756 900"><p>The Ld. counsel for applicant is present.</p><p>The record is put up along with Diary No.568/2025.</p><p>The Ld. counsel for the applicant has submitted that due to inadvertence objection raised by the office in Diary No. 568/2025 could not be removed within stipulated period as per notice dated 08.10.2025 by the office, <sup>(The same)</sup> which has been declined by the office vide notice dated 18.11.2025. The present chamber appeal has been filed on 26.11.2025 within stipulated period. It has been submitted by the Ld. counsel for the applicant that they are ready to remove the objection within a week. As such, same may be allowed.</p><p>Considering the submissions of Ld. counsel for the applicant, material placed on record and in the interest of justice, C.A. No.04/2025 is hereby allowed. <u>with condition that</u></p><p>— The Ld. counsel for applicant <sup>(is)</sup> <del>(is)</del> hereby <del>directed</del> to remove the objection raised by the office in Diary No.568/2025 within 7 days from passing of this order to enable the registry to register the same as per rules, <del>with condition that</del> <u>no</u> further extension shall be granted in this regard.</p><p style="text-align: right;">(Pankaj Kumar)<br/>Presiding Officer,<br/>DRT, Nagpur</p></td><td data-bbox="756 211 885 900"></td></tr></tbody></table>

Rb.

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead