CANARA BANK vs THE BULDHANA DIST CENTRAL CO OP BANK LTD on 12 October 2026

1. 1. The applicant has filed Pursis (Exh.12) and produced DRAT, Mumbai order dated 05.04.2017 whereby the appeal moved by respondent No.1 was dismissed in default for non-prosecution and same be taken on record.

2. 2. Reply of MA not filed by the respondents.

3. 3. The applicant has filed MA No.32/2013 for appropriate direction to respondent No.1 for immediate and forthwith compliance of the order/judgment dated 18.8.2011 of this Tribunal passed in SA No.21/2010. Further the property of respondent No.1 be attached and be sold for the recovery of sum of Rs. 165.71 lakh, also for further sum of Rs.2 lakh as ordered by this Tribunal in SA No.21/2010 along with 24% interest PA.

4. 4. Heard.

5. 5. As per perusal of the record, the applicant has not filed the copy of judgment dated 18.08.2011 and it is necessary for appreciation of this Tribunal what relief was granted in Securitization Application as claimed by the applicant under Securitization Application. Today the copy of judgment is demanded from applicant but still the copy of judgment dated 18.08.2011 is not available with applicant.

6. 6. Since the present MA is instituted before this Tribunal on 11.07.2013 and hence this MA is liable to be disposed with the liberty to the applicant to file fresh MA along with copy of judgment.

7. 7. File be consigned to the record room.

I/c Presiding Officer DRT Nagpur, Camp at DRT, Nagpur

RB