Debts Recovery Tribunals and Appellate Tribunals

BANK OF MAHARASHTRA vs Sachin Krishna Acharekar on 13 February 2020

Cites 0, Cited by 0

IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL AT PUNE

DATED THrs rHE 13tn DAY oF FEBRUARY, 2020

PRESENT: Ms. S. PRAVEENA, M.A., M.1., PRESIDING OFFICER, OA. No. 381 OF 2016

Between:

Bank of Maharashtra, a body corporate

constituted under the Banking Companies

(Acquisition and Transfer of

Undertakings), Act V of 1970 having its

Central Office at Lokmangal, 1501,

Shivaji Nagar, Pune-411 005 and its

Branch Office amongst other at Pawas

Branch, situate at Desai Building,

Bazarpeth, Pawas, Taluka & District-

Ratnagiri, Maharashtra-41s 616 through

Pawas Branch Manager Mr. Balkrishna

Savalaram Khade.

Applicant

Versus

Mr. Sachin Krishna Acharekar,

Adult, lndian lnhabitant residing At

& Post Pawas, Taluka & District -

616.

2(a) Mr. Sachine Krishna Acharkar,

legal heirs of deceased borrower -

Mr. Krishan Keshav Acharekar,

adult lndian lnhabitant At & Post

Pawas, Taluka & District

Ratnagiri, Maharashtra State-415

616.

2(b) Mr. Yogesh Krishna

Acharekar, legal heirs of deceased

borrower Mr. Krishan Keshav

Acharekar, adult Indian lnhabitant

At & Post Pawas, Taluka & District

- Ratnagiri, Maharashtra State-415

616.

2(c) Mr. Ketan Krishna Acharekar,

1.

2.

3.

4.

legal heirs of deceased borrower -

Mr. Krishan Keshav Acharekar,

adult lndian lnhabitant At & Post

Pawas, Taluka & District

Ratnagiri, Maharashtra State-415

61 6.

2(d) Smt. Varsha Kirteeraj Gosavi

@ Varsha Krishna Acharekar, legal

heirs of deceased borrower - Mr.

Krishan Keshav Acharekar, residing

at "Tapasya", 503 Bhavani Shankar

Road, Dadar (West), Mumbai-400

028.

2(e) Smt. Seema Krishna

Acharekar, legal heirs of deceased

borrower Mr. Krishan Keshav

Acharekar, adult, lndian lnhabitant

residing At & Post Pawas, Taluka &

District Ratnagiri, Maharashtra

State-415 616.

Mr. Santosh Ramakant Surve,

residing At & Post Pawas, Taluka &

District Ratnagiri, Maharashtra

State-415 616.

Mr. Mangesh Jagannath Bhatkar,

residing At & Post Pawas, Taluka &

District Ratnagiri, Maharashtra

State-415 616.

Counsel for the APPlicant

Defendants

OA.No.38L/201.6

. Defendants

Mr. R.B. Ganbote

Ex-parte

1.

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

-:ORDER:-

The Applicant Bank filed the present OA for recovery of a sum of Rs.34,64,1901- with future interest @11.75% p.a. from the date of Application, till the date of realisation from the Defendants and also for sale of OA mentioned properties. The Defendants served with Summons. They were called absent, no representation and set ex-parte on 12.09.2019. The Applicant Bank examined Mr. Balkrishna Savalaram Khade and marked 15 {aitl\q

2.

3.

4.

5.

6. documents through him as Exs.A-1 to A-15. OA.No.381/2016 Heard the Ld. Counsel for the Applicant Bank and perused the material placed on record. The point that arises for consideration is:- Whether the Applicant Bank is entitled for the claim made in the OA against the Defendants and OA mentioned properties as prayed for? As stated supra, the Defendants remained ex-parte. The Evidence Affidavit coupled with the recitals in documents viz., Exs.A.1 to A.15, marked on behalf of the Applicant Bank, ctinches the claim of the Applicant Bank against the Defendants and OA mentioned properties. Hence, I hold that the Defendants are jointly and severally liable to pay the Applicant Bank in the claim made in the OA with future interest and costs. In the result, the present OA.No.38112016 is allowed with costs, as under:- The Defendants are jointly and severally liable to pay to the Applicant Bank a sum of Rs.34,64,1901- (Rupees thirty-four lakh sixty-four thousand one hundred and ninety only) together with future interest @11.75o/o p.a. simple from the date of Application till the date of realisation; The applicant bank is entitled to proceed against the OA mentioned properties towards the realisation of its debt; the Applicant Bank is also entitled to proceed against the person and properties of the Defendants, towards realization of its dues; The Applicant Bank is entitled to the costs. The Applicant Bank is directed to file Cost Memo within 2 weeks from the date of receipt of this Order. lssue Recovery Certificate accordingly.

7. i) ii) iii) iv)

8.

9. oA.No.381./201.6

10. Communicate a copy of this order to the parties concerned, (Dictated to Steno Grade-L, transcribed by him, corrected, signed and pronounced by me in the open court on this the l3'h day of February, 2020.)

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead