Debts Recovery Tribunals and Appellate Tribunals
HDFC BANK Ltd vs Ashirwad Trading on 2 September 2025
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL, AURANGABAD
(BEFORE HON’BLE PRESIDING OFFICER, DRT AT AURANGABAD)
ORDER SHEET
[SBJ] (Diary (MA) No. 560/2024) Page 1 of 2
02.09.2025
Sr. No.04 Diary (MA) No.560/2024
Classifi
cation
No. of
Exh.
INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NO.822/2024
IN
Diary (MA) No.560/2024
HDFC Bank Ltd.
..Appellant/s
Versus
Ashirwad Trading
..Non-Appellant
Mr. Shinde Shrikishan S. - Advocate for the appellants.
None for the Non-Appellant.
1. By this Interlocutory Application No.822/2024, the applicant is seeking for condonation of 138 days’
delay in filing the MA for restoration of the CA
No.13/2023.
2. In this matter it is submitted by the counsel for the applicant that the CA No.13/2023 was dismissed for non-prosecution of the matter vide Order dated 24.11.2023.
3. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the applicant that the Chamber Appeal was abruptly listed on 24.11.2023 however in the cause list the name of the advocate of the applicant was not shown hence, the matter could not be seen by the advocate and hence it went unattended. The applicant was also not aware of the dismissal of the CA and they came to know for the first time about the order dated 24.11.2023 and on 21.02.2024.
4. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL, AURANGABAD
(BEFORE HON’BLE PRESIDING OFFICER, DRT AT AURANGABAD)
ORDER SHEET
[SBJ] (Diary (MA) No. 560/2024) Page 2 of 2
applicant bank the delay caused is not intentional nor deliberate as the applicant bank was not having knowledge about the dismissal order. If, the delay is not condoned the applicant bank caused irreparable loss as it involves huge public money. The applicant approached this Tribunal as expeditiously as possible as there was no efficacious and / or alternative remedy available to him, except filing of this application. He prayed for condonation of delay in filing the MA and also prayed for restoration of the CA No.13/2023 to its original position.
5. Heard.
6. In view of the above, I pass the following order.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
A. Interlocutory Application No.822/2024 stands allowed and the delay of 138 days’ is condoned. B. The Diary(MA) No.560/2024 stands allowed. C. CA No.13/2023 is hereby restored to its original position. D. List the matter CA No.13/2023 before the Registrar for completion of pleadings on 25th ` September, 2025. Sd/-
(Dr. J.R. Chauhan)
Presiding Officer
Debts Recovery Tribunal, Aurangabad