BANK OF INDIA vs WALMIK SOMINATH INGALE on 1 September 2025

IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL, AURANGABAD

(BEFORE HON’BLE PRESIDING OFFICER, DRT AT AURANGABAD)

ORDER SHEET

[SBJ] (Diary (MA) No. 1173/2025) Page 1 of 2

01.09.2025

Sr. No.09 Diary (MA) No.1173/2025

Classifi

cation

No. of

Exh.

INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION Diary

NO.1822/2025

IN

Diary (MA) No.1173/2025

Bank of India

..Appellant/s

Versus

Walmik Sominath Ingale

..Non-Appellant

Mr. K.D. Pande - Advocate for the appellants.

None for the Non-Appellant.

1. By

this

Interlocutory

Application

Diary

No.1822/2025,

the

applicant

is

seeking

for

condonation of 475 days’ delay in filing the MA for restoration of the OA No.135/2023.

2. In this matter it is submitted by the counsel for the applicant that the OA No.135/2023 was dismissed for non-prosecution of the matter vide Order dated 05.03.2024.

3. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the applicant that the earlier advocate of the applicant bank removed from their panel and the applicant bank was also not aware of the dismissal of the OA

and they came to know the same in the last week of February, 2025. Thereafter, immediately the applicant bank asked him for taking further appropriate steps for restoration of the OA.

IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL, AURANGABAD

(BEFORE HON’BLE PRESIDING OFFICER, DRT AT AURANGABAD)

ORDER SHEET

[SBJ] (Diary (MA) No. 1173/2025) Page 2 of 2

4. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the applicant bank the delay caused is not intentional but an incidental as the applicant bank was not having knowledge about the dismissal order. If, the delay is not condoned the applicant bank caused irreparable loss as it involves huge public money. He prayed for condonation of delay in filing the MA and also prayed for restoration of the OA No.135/2023 to its original position.

5. Heard.

6. In view of the above, I pass the following order.