Debts Recovery Tribunals and Appellate Tribunals

DINESHKUMAR MURLIDHARRAO INANI vs MAHARASHTRA STATE COOPERATIVE BANK on 22 May 2024

Cites 0, Cited by 0

IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL, AURANGABAD

(BEFORE HON’BLE PRESIDING OFFICER, DRT AT AURANGABAD)

ORDER SHEET

[SBJ] (MA No.13/2015) Page 1 of 2

22.05.2024

Sr. No.12

MA No. 13/2015

Classific

ation

No. of

Exh.

MISC. APPLICATION No.13/2015

Dineshkumar Murlidharrao Inani

..Applicant/s

Versus

Maharashtra State Co-Operative Bank &

others.

..Respondent/s

Mr. A.A. Yadkikar - Advocate for the applicant.

Mr. Sanket Suryawanshi - Advocate for the respondent.

The matter is taken through Hybrid.

1. In this matter the applicant is a third party having as an unpaid seller as per the Contract Act. He moved these petitions for he has charge as unpaid seller.

2. The right of the unpaid seller shall be a priority because the goods which have been supplied if the payment is not made after the sale, balance payment has to be made to the person holding a charge as unpaid seller.

3. Now who has to pay whether the purchaser has to pay or the bank has to pay that is a matter of recording of the evidence and cross-examined that means the trial has to take place.

4. Proceeding before this Tribunal are summary in nature therefore the matter which require extensive trial has to go to Civil Court only as right of unpaid seller can be enforced IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL, AURANGABAD

(BEFORE HON’BLE PRESIDING OFFICER, DRT AT AURANGABAD)

ORDER SHEET

[SBJ] (MA No.13/2015) Page 2 of 2

in Civil Court only. Since the applicant has bonafidely pursing his remedy before this Tribunal the period from the date of auction till uploading of the orders shall be excluded from the limitation as in pursing in the wrong court.

5. With these directions this Miscellaneous Application No.13/2015 shall be disposed off.

6. In view of the above, I pass the following order.

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

A. The Miscellaneous Application No.13/2015 stands disposed off. B. Since the applicant was bonafidely pursing his remedy before this Tribunal the period from the date of auction till uploading of the orders shall be excluded from the limitation as being pursing in the wrong court in case he wish to avail remedy in Civil Court. C. File be consigned to the record room.

(Vimal Gupta) Presiding Officer Debts Recovery Tribunal, Aurangabad

Uploaded on 22/05/2024

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead