Debts Recovery Tribunals and Appellate Tribunals
BANK OF INDIA vs Dattatray on 3 January 2022
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL, AURANGABAD
(BEFORE HON’BLE PRESIDING OFFICER, DRT AT AURANGABAD)
ORDER SHEET
[SBJ] ( MA No.01/2022) Page 1 of 2
03.01.2022
Sr. No.16 MA No.01/2022
Classific
ation
No. of
Exh.
MISC. APPLICATION No.01/2022
IN
ORIGINAL APPLICATION NO.580/2020
Bank of India
..Applicant
Versus
Dattatray Baburao Shendge
..Respondent
Mr. A.U. Deshmukh– Advocate for the applicant Bank None for the respondent.
1. This Miscellaneous Application No.01/2022 is filed for modification of order dated 1st November, 2021.
2. The counsel for the applicant bank submits that after passing of the order the applicant has filed application in prescribed format for return of documents alongwith certified copies of the original documents.
3. The counsel for the applicant had filed Interlocutory Application No.856/2021 with prayer clause (C) for refund of court fees and prayer clause (D) for returning of original documents. It is submitted by the counsel of the applicant bank that in the order dated 1st November, 2021 there were no directions in respect of refund of court fees and return of original documents.
4. By this Miscellaneous Application, the counsel for the applicant bank prayed for refund of court fees and return of original documents.
5. In view of the above, I pass the following order through video conferencing:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
A. The Miscellaneous Application No. 01/2022 is hereby allowed.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL, AURANGABAD (BEFORE HON’BLE PRESIDING OFFICER, DRT AT AURANGABAD) ORDER SHEET [SBJ] ( MA No.01/2022) Page 2 of 2
B. As per DRT Regulation 25, other Original documents if any filed be returned by keeping certified copies on record through Authorised Officer only after the time of appeal or review is gone and not before that. However due to COVID-19 situation it will take long time and shall be returned only after situation becomes normal. C. Registry is to refund court fee as per Rule 5 of the Debts Recovery Tribunal (Refund of Court Fees) Rules, 2013. The Bank shall intimate the Registry about the details of account where refund has to be credited through E-mail only which shall be done when situation becomes normal. D. Consign the file to the Record Room.
Both the parties may download the order from the official web-site which will be treated as a true copy as due to COVID 19 & staff constraints, the certified copies cannot be issued as of now till further orders.
(Vimal Gupta)
Presiding Officer
Debts Recovery Tribunal, Aurangabad