Debts Recovery Tribunals and Appellate Tribunals

MANISHA WO MANOJ ROTE vs BANK OF MAHARASHTRA on 23 November 2021

Cites 0, Cited by 0

IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL, AURANGABAD

(BEFORE HON’BLE PRESIDING OFFICER, DRT AT AURANGABAD)

ORDER SHEET

[APK] ( MA No.18/2018) Page 1 of 2

23.11.2021

Sr. No.02 MA No.18/2018

Classific

ation

No. of

Exh.

MISC. APPLICATION No.18/2018

Manisha Manoj Rote and others

..Applicants

Versus

Bank of Maharashtra and others

.. Respondents

Mr. A.D.Shinde – Advocate for the applicants.

Mr. V.R.Patil – Advocate for respondent bank.

Due to Covid 19 situation the matter is taken through Video Conference.

1. The learned counsel for the applicants has filed Interlocutory Application no.1102/2021 for stay along with list of documents (Exhibit-10) and Interlocutory Application no.1103/2021 for amendment in MA along with list of documents (Exhibit-11) which is taken on record.

2. The learned counsel for the applicants submits that there is delay of two days in filing the Securitisation Application. The learned counsel for the respondent bank has no objection to condone the delay in the filing the Securitisation Application. As such the delay is condoned.

3. The learned counsel for the respondent bank submits that no bids have been received in the matter.

4. In view of the statement made by the learned counsel for the respondent bank, I pass the following order through video conferencing:

IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL, AURANGABAD

(BEFORE HON’BLE PRESIDING OFFICER, DRT AT AURANGABAD)

ORDER SHEET

[APK] ( MA No.18/2018) Page 2 of 2

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

A. Misc. Application No.18/2018 is allowed. B. Interlocutory application no.1102/2021 for stay and 1103/2021 for amendment area disposed off as infructuous. C. Registry is directed to register the securitisation application as per rules. D. The respondent bank is directed to file reply to the Securitisation Application, the applicants are directed to file rejoinder if any, thereafter and affidavit of evidence if any be filed by both the parties till next date of hearing. List the matter before Registrar through VC for completion of pleading on 28th December, 2021.

Both the parties may download the order from the official web-site which will be treated as a true copy as due to COVID 19 & staff constraints, the certified copies cannot be issued as of now till further orders.

(Vimal Gupta)

Presiding Officer

Debts Recovery Tribunal, Aurangabad

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead