Debts Recovery Tribunals and Appellate Tribunals
RAMINENI GAURY SRINADH CHOWDARY vs IIFL HOME FINANCE LTD on 8 June 2026
**IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL
VISAKHAPATNAM**
Present: - Sri Krishna Gopal Dwivedi, Presiding Officer Dated the 8<sup>th</sup> Day of June, 2026
M.A. No.210 of 2025
in
S.A. No.73 of 2024
**Between:**
Sri Ramineni Gaury Srinadh Chowdary, S/o Subba Rao, resident of D.No.1-2-39, JKC Nagar, 2<sup>nd</sup> Lane, Guntur District.
.....Petitioner/Appellant
**And:**
The Authorised Officer, IIFL Homes, Rep. by its Branch Manager, Sri Sai Complex, Lakshmipuram Main Road, Beside Nitingal Hospital, 1<sup>st</sup> Floor, Guntur and others.
.....Respondents
Present:-
Sri. S.S. Sharma, Ld. Counsels for the appellant
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
**ORDER**
The applicant has filed the present MA and prayed to set aside the dismissal order dt.19.11.2025 passed in SA 73/2024 against the applicant in the interest of justice.
Perused the record. In this MA, no one appeared on behalf of the OP, hence OP is debarred from filing counter vide order dt.30.03.2026. Perused the record. SA 73/2024 is dismissed for default by this Tribunal on 19.11.2025. The petitioner has filed the present petition on 04.12.2025, hence this MA is within time and limitation period.
As per MA, the junior counsel of the applicant advocate got confused and could not represent the matter and file track report for service of notice to 3<sup>rd</sup> respondent and due to this reason, this Tribunal dismissed the appeal as applicant counsel did not show any interest in prosecution of the matter.
Since the petitioner has filed this MA within Limitation period and explanation given by the petitioner counsel reveals reliable.
Hence on the basis of the above discussion, MA 210/2025 is hereby allowed and order dt.19.11.2025 passed in SA 73/2024 is hereby recalled and I direct the Ld. Registrar to register the SA 73/2024 on its original number and send notice to the respondents in SA fixing the case on 17.07.2026. I also direct the petitioner to file necessary requisites for sending registered notice to the respondents in SA within three days before Registrar.
[Dictated to steno, transcribed by her, corrected and pronounced by me in the open court on this day of 8<sup>th</sup> June, 2026]
**PRESIDING OFFICER DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL VISAKHAPATNAM**