Debts Recovery Tribunals and Appellate Tribunals

GONGADA SRINIVASA RAO vs STATE BANK OF INDIA on 17 October 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL

VISAKHAPATNAM

Present :- SHRI KRISHNA GOPAL DWIVEDI,

PRESIDING OFFICER

Dated 17<sup>th</sup> October, 2026

MA 13 of 2025 in SA 296 of 2019

Between

1. Sri Gongada Srinivasa Rao (DIED).

2. Smt. Gongada Padmavathi, W/o Late Srinivasa Rao, Hindu, Aged 48 years, Resident of D.No.86-4-24-1, Tilak Road, Manthena Gardens, Rajahmundry, East Godavari Dist.

3. Gangada Naga Mounika, D/o Late Srinivasa Rao, Hindu, Aged 26 years, Resident of D.No.86-4-24-1, Tilak Road, Manthena Gardens, Rajahmundry, East Godavari Dist.

4. Gangada Divya Sree, D/o Late Srinivasa Rao, Hindu, Aged 25 years, Resident of D.No.86-4-24-1, Tilak Road, Manthena Gardens, Rajahmundry, East Godavari Dist.

..... Petitioners/Appellants

1. State bank of India, Stressed Management Branch Rep. by its Authorised Officer, Door No.6-2-915, Kirathbad, Hyderabad-500001

2. Authorized Officer, State Bank of India, SAM Branch, Secunderabad, 5th Floor, Backside Block of HMWSSB Compound, Door No.6-2-915, Kirathbad, Hyderabad-500001.

3. M/s. Coastal Automobiles Pvt. Limited represented by its Managing Director, Sri Bathineedi Suresh Babu, Registered Office at D.No.1-176, Hukumpeta, Rajahmundry -533105

... Respondents

Ld Counsel for Applicant

-- Shri Nali Seshu Kumar

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

**ORDER**

In the above MA the applicant has prayed to condone the delay of 163 days in filing the restoration petition.

As per order sheet dt. 06.04.2026 R1 and R2 are debarred from filing counter. Vide order dt. 19.08.2026 R3 is also debarred from filing counter.

I have heard the Ld. Counsel of the applicant and perused the record. As per MA SA 296/2019 was filed by the husband of the applicant. During the pendency of SA husband of the applicant died leaving behind petitioner and her daughter as his class-1 legal heirs. On the fixed date 21.06.2024 no one appeared on behalf of applicant. Applicant had gone to Hyderabad to stay along with her elder daughter who is the 3<sup>rd</sup> petitioner.

After scanning the facts I find that the petitioner husband died and petitioner could not present before this Tribunal to prosecute the case. The explanation give by the petitioner in this MA reveals trust worthy. On the basis of above discussion I condone the delay of 163 days in filing the restoration petition and accordingly MA 13/2025 is allowed without cost.

I direct the Ld. Registrar to register the set aside petition if otherwise in order and sent notice to OPs of set aside petition. I also direct the applicant to file the necessary requisites for sending the notice in the Miscellaneous application **(Dictated to Steno, transcribed by her, corrected and pronounced by me in the open court on this 17<sup>th</sup> October, 2026)**

PRESIDING OFFICER DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL VISAKHAPATNAM

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead