Debts Recovery Tribunals and Appellate Tribunals
Indian Bank vs S Sankaralingam Chettiar on 1 July 2026
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL –I AT CHENNAI
Dated this 1st Day of July, 2026
PRESENT: SHRI A.S.JAYACHANDRA
Presiding Officer
T.A. No.2 of 2026
[a/w Counter Claim not registered in this DRT
(Old CC No.1/2025, DRT, Madurai)]
1.
M/s. Sankaralingam Chettiar
Sole Prop. S. Senthilathiban
18, Thangasalai Street
Aruppukottai – 626 101.
2.
Mrs. S. Jayalakshmi
W/o S. Senthilathiban
67, Josiam Shanmugam Chettiar Street
Aruppukottai – 626 101
Virudhunagar District.
Tamil Nadu
. . . Applicants
Versus
1.
Indian Bank
Aruppukottai Branch
Aruppukottai,
Represented by its
Zonal Manager, Aruppukottai
Virudhunagar District.
2.
M/s. United India Insurance Co. Ltd.
Branch Office
KPV Complex
Pandalgudi Road
Aruppukottai – 626 101.
Virudhunagar District.
3.
The Reliance Asset Reconstruction
Company Ltd.
Represented by its Chief Manager
Registered Office at Reliance Centre
6th Floor, North Wing
off Western Express Highway
Santacruz (East)
Mumbai – 400 055.
. . . Defendants
: - PROCEEDINGS DT.01.07.2026 - :
Applicant in TA by Sh. Kailsh, Adv.
D1 & D2 – Counter claimants by Ms.Swathi.P
Defendant No.3 by Sh.G.Illangovan – undertakes to file the vakalatanama It is seen from the order sheet that the matter which was pending before DRT, Madurai is transferred to this Tribunal by noting the following:
(a) OA was filed for recovery of a sum of Rs.50,52,074/- against D1 & D2
along with interest. – The OA was filed in the year 1999.
(b) It is noted that the Defendants 1 & 2 had filed the counter claim numbered as CC 1/2025 before DRT, Madurai, for a sum of Rs.651.30
Crores.
(c) Since the counter claim is filed for a sum of Rs.651.30 Crores, the pecuniary jurisdiction to try the case involving more than Rs.100 Crores is with this Tribunal.
(d) Thus opining, the entire matter is sent to this Tribunal, by the Ld. DRT, Madurai.
Today, the parties appear through their counsel. Let the counter claim be registered in this Tribunal.
This matter was taken up before the Ld. DRT, Madurai as per the directions of the Hon’ble High Court as could be seen from the order sheets dated 13.04.2026 and 19.05.2026. Considering the directions passed, the matter cannot be adjourned any further and impending registration of the counter claim, the same is considered for the expeditious disposal.
Orders on Counter claim:-
1. As noted above, the Bank had filed the OA for recovery of a sum of Rs.50,52,074/- on 11.01.1999.
2. The Order Sheet shows that the reply statement of Defendants have been filed 24 years ago as per the order sheet of Registrar dated 07.08.2001.
3. On 05.10.2001, the matter was posted for cross – examination, since none represented the Defendants and the matter was adjourned for cross – examination of Bank Witness by 13.11.2001.
4. The Counter Claim No.1/2025 (Registered before DRT, Madurai) is filed on 22.10.2024, after an inordinate delay of 24 years.
5. It is clear from the above, that the Counter Claim is filed nearly after two and half decades.
6. Section 19(5) of the RDB Act, 1993 prescribes that after the date of service of summons, the Written Statement, Claim for set-off or a Counter Claim under Section 19(8) if any shall be filed within a period of thirty days.
7. Section 19(8) provides for filing the Counter Claim before the Defendants have delivered their defense or before the time limited for delivering the defense has expired.
8. A clear reading of the provisions of Section 19(5) and Section 19(8), establishes that the Counter Claim ought to have been filed within the time provided for delivering the defense. In the present case, the WS
was filed in the year 2001. Counter Claim is filed in the year 2024. This makes it very clear that the Counter Claim is filed after two and half decades and the counter claimants had slept over for nearly two and half decades and woke up in the year 2024.
9. The dates are explicitly seen from the record. Thus the Counter Claim placed before this Tribunal is highly barred under limitation and the same cannot be entertained after two and half decades.
10. For the above said reasons, the Counter Claim is being disposed of by the following:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
: - O R D E R - :
Counter Claim bearing Old No.1/2025 (as registered before the Ld. DRT, Madurai) stands rejected as highly barred under limitation. A copy of this order be communicated to the parties namely the Defendants 1 & 2 and the plaintiff bank. The TA file bearing No.2/2026 (Old No.TA 2/2025 of DRT, Madurai) be sent back along with the entire records for disposal in accordance with law since this Tribunal cannot entertain at the adjudication of the TA for want of pecuniary jurisdiction, in the backdrop of the counter claim being disposed of as rejected. This matter be listed before Ld. DRT, Madurai on 22.07.2026 for appropriate orders. Sd/- (A.S.JAYACHANDRA)
PRESIDING OFFICER
DRT-I, CHENNAI
(Dictated to PS who typed in the system, corrected, signed and pronounced in open court on this 1st Day of July, 2026)