Central Administrative Tribunal

B Madhusudana vs POST AP CIRCLE on 16 October 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL HYDERABAD (TELANGANA) NO. 5-10-193, 1ST FLOOR, HACA BHAVAN,HYDERABAD - 500004 Order Sheet Item no.: 4 O.A./755/2026 (ANDHRA PRADESH) [ TRANSFER ] Court No.: 3 No of Adjournment: 1 Order Dated: 16/10/2026 B MADHUSUDANA Vs POST AP CIRCLE

For Applicant(s) Advocate : RACHNA KUMARI

For Respondent(s) Advocate : B GAYATRI VARMA Order of The Tribunal Letter, dt.15.10.2026, has been submitted by the applicant’s counsel seeking corrigendum to the order, dt.05.10.2026, in O.A./755/2026, in as much directing the Respondents to dispose of the applicant’s representation(s), dt.21.09.2026, 22.09.2026 & 27.09.2026, along with the representation, dt. 29.09.2026. In view of the same, the matter is taken up for consideration under the caption “For being mentioned’. Para 8 of the order, dt.05.10.2026, in O.A./755/2026, may be read as under:

8. Having heard the counsels for the parties and perused the material on record, we are of the view that the matter can be disposed of, at the admission stage itself, by directing the Respondents to dispose of the applicant’s representation(s), dt. 21.09.2026, 22.09.2026, 27.09.2026 & 29.09.2026, annexed as Ann. A-3 to the O.A., since the applicant has not yet been relieved. T he competent authority, from among the Respondents, is directed to take a holistic view of the grounds submissions narrated hereinabove, as well as the applicant’s representation, dated. 29.09.2026, by passing a reasoned and speaking order, uninfluenced by the impugned transfer order(s), dt. 21.09.2026 & 22.09.2026, within a period of thirty days of the receipt of a certified copy of this Order. It is further made clear that no adverse action is to be taken against the applicant until the disposal of the above representation(s); i.e., the applicant may not be relieved until that time. The principles of natural justice shall follow and the applicant shall be afforded an opportunity of personal hearing. The matter is released. Registry is directed to issue a corrigendum to this effect.

Varun Sindhu Kul Kaumudi Member (A) MR MANISH GARG Member (J) Minhajul Haque ( court master )

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead