Central Administrative Tribunal
Shaik Abdulkader vs DEFENCE on 6 October 2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL HYDERABAD (TELANGANA) NO. 5-10-193, 1ST FLOOR, HACA BHAVAN,HYDERABAD - 500004 Order Sheet Item no.: 4 O.A./758/2026 (TELANGANA) [ PROMOTION ] Court No.: 1 No of Adjournment: Order Dated: 06/10/2026 SHAIK ABDULKADER Vs DEFENCE
For Applicant(s) Advocate : RACHNA KUMARI
For Respondent(s) Advocate : M VENKATA SWAMY, Sr.PC for CG Order of The Tribunal Heard Mrs.Rachna Kumari, learned counsel for the applicant. Mr.M.Venkata Swamy, learned Sr.Panel Counsel, appears on behalf of the Respondents. Issue notice to the respondents for filing reply within four weeks. Rejoinder, if any, may be filed within two weeks thereafter. Learned counsel for the applicant contends that as per the new Recruitment Rules, applicant is eligible to be considered, but no DPC is conducted by the Respondents thereby the rights of the applicant is effected. In view of the above, it is directed that, in the event of DPC likely to be held, applicant can be considered to the extent of new Recruitment Rules.
Post the matter on 13.11.2026 before the Registrar for completion of pleadings Varun Sindhu Kul Kaumudi Member (A) MR MANISH GARG Member (J) Sandhya Pandirlapalli ( ps )