Central Administrative Tribunal
B Pamidattu vs EXPENDITURE on 28 September 2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL HYDERABAD (TELANGANA) NO. 5-10-193, 1ST FLOOR, HACA BHAVAN,HYDERABAD - 500004 Order Sheet Item no.: 9 O.A./1415/2025 (TELANGANA) [ NON-FUNCTIONAL UPGRADATION ] [ SENIOR CITIZEN ] Court No.: 1 No of Adjournment: 7 Order Dated: 28/09/2026 B PAMIDATTU Vs EXPENDITURE
For Applicant(s) Advocate : DR P JAYASEELA RAO
For Respondent(s) Advocate : B RAJESHWAR RAO Order of The Tribunal On 24.08.2026, it was informed that reply has been served on the other side. However, the applicant's counsel submits the he has not received the copy of the reply. It is further submitted by the respondents' counsel that reply has been filed in the Registry. Under these circumstances, counsel for the respondents is directed to supply a copy of the reply to the other side by tomorrow. Registry is directed to verify the status of the reply, and, if filed, place the same on record. List the case on 28.10.2026.
Shalini Misra Member (A) Umesh Gajankush Member (J) Minhajul Haque ( court master )