Debts Recovery Tribunals and Appellate Tribunals

INDUSIND BANK LIMITED vs Ravuthar Naina Mohammed S on 1 February 2019

Cites 0, Cited by 0

BEFORE THE DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL –I ATCHENNAI

Dated this 13th Day of February, 2019

Present: SHRI N.V.BADARINATH

PRESIDING OFFICER

TA197/2018

(OA 168/2016 on the file of DRT-III, Chennai)

Indusind Bank Ltd.,

No. 24, 1st floor

Veeramakaliamman Complex

Pudukottairoad

Aranthangi – 614 616.

Applicant Bank

Vs.

1.

S. Ravuthar Naina Mohamed

S/o Sheik Abdul Kadhar

270 / 1, Main Road, Karur

Avudayar Koil, Pudhkottai – 622 204.

2.

S. Ravichandran

5 / 46, Thirupunavasai, Avudaiyar Koil

Pudhukottai – 614 629.

3.

S. Noorammal

12 / 65 / D, Marur

Avudaiyar Koil, Pudhukottai – 622 204.

….Defendants

Counsel for the Applicant Bank :

M/s Ramalingam & Associates

Defendants remained exparte.

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

1. This application is filed by the applicant bank under Section 19(1) of Recovery of Debts and Bankruptcy Act, 1993 (formerly Recovery of Debts Due to Banks and Financial Institutions Act, 1993) against the defendants jointly and severally for recovery of a sum of Rs.12,44,936.18p together with interest at 16% per annum from the date of filing of the application till the date of realization in full, along with costs of this application.

2. Defendants remained exparte.

3. Heard the Ld. Counsel for the applicant, perused the OA averments and the record placed before the Tribunal. The point that arises for consideration is Whether the applicant bank is entitled for the amount claimed in the application from the defendants? If so, at what rate of interest?

4. Point Whether the applicant bank is entitled for the amount claimed in the application from the defendants? If so, at what rate of interest? 4.1 To prove its claim, the applicant bank filed proof affidavit through its Authorised Officer along with 22 documents, which are marked as Ex.A-1 to A-22. The proof affidavit of the applicant bank remain unchallenged and unrebutted. Therefore, on careful consideration of proof affidavit along with Exhibits filed on behalf of the applicant bank, besides the material placed before the Tribunal, the Tribunal is satisfied that the applicant bank has successfully proved the TAclaim against the defendants. Hence, it is held that the applicant bank is entitled for a Recovery Certificate for a sum of Rs.12,44,936.18p together with pendent lite and future interest at 9% per annum (simple) from the date of filing of the application till the date of realization in full. Point is answered accordingly.

5. For the reasons stated as above, it is held that the applicant bank is entitled for a Recovery Certificate against the defendants jointly and severally for recovery of a sum of Rs.12,44,936.18p together with pendent lite and future interest at 9% per annum (simple) from the date of filing of the application till the date of realization in full, for sale of the schedule mentioned property along with costs of this application.

6. In the result, application is allowed as under:

(a) The applicant bank is entitled to recover a sum of Rs.12,44,936.18p together with pendent lite and future interest at 9% per annum (simple) from the date of filing of the application till the date of realization in full, from the defendants jointly and severally.

(b) It is further ordered that in case of default of payment by the defendants, the defendants are personally liable for all such amounts due.

(c) It is further ordered that any amount remitted or realized, if any, during the course of the proceedings, shall be given due credit to the loan account of the defendants.

(d) The applicant bank is entitled for costs of this application.

7. The applicant bank is directed to file costs memo within two weeks of the receipt of this order.

8. Issue recovery certificate in favour of the applicant bank in terms of this final order.

9. Communicate a copy of the order to the parties concerned in terms of Rule 16 read with Rule 2(c) of DRT (Procedure) Rules, 1993. (Dictated to stenographer (PS), transcribed by him, corrected, signed and pronouncedby me in the Open Court, this 13th day of February,2019) Sd/- (N.V.BADARINATH) PRESIDING OFFICER DRT-I, CHENNAI

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead