Debts Recovery Tribunals and Appellate Tribunals
HDFC BANK vs Ms Bewo Technologies P Ltd on 31 January 2019
BEFORE THE DEBTS RECOVERYTRIBUNAL –I ATCHENNAI
Dated this 31st Day of January,2019
Present: SHRI N.V.BADARINATH
PRESIDING OFFICER
OA 234/2018
M/s HDFC Bank Ltd.
Rep. by its Manager,
No.110, Ceebros Building,
4th Floor,Nelson Manikkam Road,
Aminjikarai, Chennai 600 029.
…Applicant Bank
Vs.
1. M/s BEWO TECHNOLOGIES PRIVATELIMITED
Rep. by its Director
Sampath Kumar & Narayana Rao Sharad,
M 10, 19th Avenue, Ashok Nagar,
Chennai, Tamil Nadu 600 083.
2. Mrs. Sampath Kumar,
M 10, 19th Avenue, Ashok Nagar,
Chennai, Tamil Nadu 600 083.
3. Narayana Rao Sharad,
No.105, SBM Colony,Ananda Nagar,
Bangalore, Karnataka 560 024.
…Defendants
Counsel for the Applicant Bank
:
M/s D. Satyaraj, S. Sheik Ismail & J. Prince Defendants remained exparte.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
O R D E R
1. This application is filed by the applicant bank under Section 19(1) of Recovery of Debts and Bankruptcy Act, 1993 (formerly Recovery of Debts Due to Banks and Financial Institutions Act, 1993) against the defendants jointly and severally for recovery of a sum of Rs.12,58,347.93p together with interest at 15.75% per annum with monthly rests from 8.1.2018 till the date of realization in full, along with costs of this application.
2. Brief facts of Application are as follows: 2.1 The applicant bank submits that the first defendant is the borrower, the second and third defendants are the co-borrowers of the 1st defendant company. It is stated that in the year 2016, the first defendant through 2nd and 3rd defendants approached the applicant bank for a business loan and submitted the loan application on 13.9.2016 requesting the applicant bank to grant a loan of Rs.20.00 lakhs. 2.2 The applicant considered the said request of the defendants and sanctioned the Business Loan of Rs.20.00 lakhs under Loan Account No.42365831. The defendants availed the said loan and executed security documents such as Agreement for Loan, etc. on 16.9.2016 . As per the loan agreement, the defendants agreed to repay the said loan in 36 equal monthly instalments of Rs.70,067/- per month commencing from 4.10.2016 to 4.9.2019 and to pay interest at 15.75% per annum with monthly rests and penal interest charges at 2% per month on unpaid EMI’s, as per the loan agreement dated 16.9.2016.
2.3. The applicant bank further stated that the defendants were irregular in making payments of the instalments under the above loan. Since the defendants failed and neglected to pay any amount under the loan account in spite of repeated demands and reminders, the applicant bank caused a legal notice on 18.4.2018, calling upon the defendants to repay the entire sum of Rs.12,58,347.93p, which included the principal, interest and other charges. Thereafter,the defendants did not come forwardto clear the dues. Hence, the present OA.
3. Defendants remained exparte.
4. Point for consideration: Whether the applicant bank is entitled for the amount claimed in the application from the defendants? If so, at what rate of interest?
5. Point Whether the applicant bank is entitled for the amount claimed in the application from the defendants? If so, at what rate of interest? 5.1 To prove its claim, the applicant bank filed proof affidavit through its Manager along with 9 documents, which are marked as Ex.A1 to A9. The proof affidavit of the applicant bank remain unchallenged. Therefore, on careful consideration of the material placed before the Tribunal, coupled with the proof affidavit filed on behalf of the applicant bank, I am satisfied that the applicant bank has successfully proved the OA claim against the defendants. Hence, it is held that the applicant bank is entitled for a Recovery Certificate for a sum of Rs.12,58,347.93p along with future interest at 15.75% per annum (simple) from 8.1.2018 till the date of realization in full. Point is answered accordingly.
6. For the reasons stated as above, it is held that the applicant bank is entitled for a Recovery Certificate against the defendants jointly and severally for a sum of Rs.12,58,347.93p together with future interest at 15.75% per annum (simple) from 8.1.2018 till the date of realization in full, along with costs.
7. In the result, application is allowed as under:
(a) The applicant bank is entitled to recover a sum of Rs.12,58,347.93p together with future interest at 15.75% per annum (simple) from 8.1.2018 till the date of realization in full from the defendants jointly and severally.
(b) It is further ordered that in case of default of payment by the defendants, defendants 2
and 3 are personally liable for all such amounts due.
(c) It is further ordered that any amount remitted or realized, if any, during the course of the proceedings, shall be given due credit to the loan account of the defendants.
(d) The applicant bank is entitled for costs of this application.
8. The applicant bank is directed to file costs memo within two weeks of the receipt of this order.
9. Issue recovery certificate in favour of the applicant bank in terms of this final order.
10. Communicate a copy of the order to the parties concerned in terms of Rule 16 read with Rule 2(c) of DRT (Procedure)Rules, 1993. (Dictated to stenographer (SN), transcribed by him, corrected, signed and pronounced by me in the Open Court, this 31st day of January, 2019) Sd/- (N.V.BADARINATH) PRESIDING OFFICER DRT-I, CHENNAI