Debts Recovery Tribunals and Appellate Tribunals
KARNATAKA BANK LIMITED vs Mr G Charles Vasanthakumar on 29 January 2024
T.A. No. 1630 of 2023
29.01.2024
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL-III, CHENNAI
Dated this the 29th day of January, 2024
Present: Shri Ganapathi K.R.K.
Presiding Officer
TRANSFERRED APPLICATION No. 1630 of 2023
(Originally filed before DRT- II, Chennai as OA No.164 of 2019 and thereafter transferred to this Tribunal and renumbered as TA No.1630 of 2023)
The Karnataka Bank Ltd.,
Branch Office At No.324, Thambu Chetty Street, Parrys, Chennai-600 001.
Rep. by its Chief Manager
….Applicants
Vs
1.
Mr.G.Charles Vasanthakumar
Proprietor M/s. Grace Services
S/o. George Augastin
S-2, II Floor, Phase-1,
Spencer Plaza, No.769, Anna Salai,
Chennai-600 002.
Also at
Flat No. C-3, III Floor, Black Rose
Rc Metha Green Park, Arul Nagar,
Mathavaram Milk Colony Road,
Mathavaram, Chennai – 600 051.
2.
Mrs.D.Esther Santhakumari,
W/o. Mr.G.Charles Vasanthakumar,
Flat no.C-3, III Floor, Black Rose,
RC Metha Green Park, Arul Nagar,
Mathavaram Milk Colony Road,
Mathavarm, Chennai-600 051
….Defendant s
Counsels on record / appeared:
Counsel for Applicant
:
M/s. Ramalingam & Associates
T.A. No. 1630 of 2023
29.01.2024
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
1. This TA is filed by the applicant bank for recovery of a sum of Rs.28,44,759/- together with future interest and costs.
2. Memo vide SR No.365/24 is filed by applicant bank stating therein that during pendency of the above OA, defendants had approached applicant bank for settlement under OTS, which was accepted by applicant bank and accordingly, defendants had remitted a sum of Rs.22 lakhs towards full and final settlement of the OA claim. Hence, applicant bank prayed that the OA claim may be treated as settled out of Court and also prayed for return of original documents filed along with proof affidavit.
3. Copy of memo is sent to other side by post and applicant bank had furnished postal receipts evidencing the same.
4. Perused. Memo is taken on record. Allowed. In the result, this OA is disposed of as settled out of Court, however without costs. Registry is directed to return all original documents filed along with proof affidavit to applicant bank under proper acknowledgment as per extant guidelines. All other interlocutory applications, if any pending shall stand closed. (Dictated to PS, transcribed by her, corrected, signed and processed through E-drt on this the 29th day of January, 2024)
Sd/- (GANAPATHI K.R.K)
PRESIDING OFFICER