Debts Recovery Tribunals and Appellate Tribunals

IDBI BANK vs MANI on 19 February 2024

Cites 0, Cited by 0

E-drt Dy.No.1396/22 (OASR12675/22)

19.02.2024

IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL-III, CHENNAI

Dated this the 19th day of February, 2024

Present: Shri Ganapathi K.R.K.

Presiding Officer

E-drt Dy.No.1396/2022 (OASR No.12675/2022)

M/s. IDBI Bank Ltd.,

Rep by its Asst. Gen Manager

Mr. Sreenath & R. Shekar

K.K.Nagar Branch,

Plot No.780, Door No.3,

Munusamy Salai, K.K.Nagar,

Chennai-600 078.

….Applicant

Vs

1.

Mr. J.V. Mani

S/o. S.Velayutham,

No.61, First Floor,

Edapalayam Street.

Park Town, Chennai-600 003

Also at

Mr. J.V.Mani,

S/o. S. Velayutham

No.13, Seikkilar, 2nd Street,

K.K.Nagar, Chennai-600 078.

2.

K. Vinayagam,

S/o. Shri Kannappan,

No.141, 1st Street, Kannigapuram,

K.K.Nagar, Chennai-600 0078.

3.

Mrs. V. Anandhi,

W/o. Mr. K.Vinayagam,

No.141, 1st Street, Kannigapuram,

K.K.Nagar, Chennai-600 0078.

….Defendants

Counsels on record / appeared:

Counsel for Applicant

:

M/s. S. Parthasarthy

E-drt Dy.No.1396/22 (OASR12675/22)

19.02.2024

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

1. This contemplated OA is filed by the applicant bank for recovery of a sum of Rs.28,63,150/- together with future interest and costs.

2. A memo vide SR No.1215/24 is filed by applicant bank stating therein that during pendency of scrutiny of the above OA, defendants had approached applicant bank for settlement under OTS, which was accepted by applicant bank and accordingly, defendants had remitted a sum of Rs.32,57,913.08p on 14.12.2023 towards full and final settlement of the OA claim. Hence, applicant bank prayed that the OA claim may be treated as settled out of Court.

3. Copy of memo is sent to other side by post by applicant bank, postal receipts furnished.

4. Perused. Memo is taken on record. Allowed. In the result, this OA is disposed of as settled out of Court (vide separate order), however without costs. All other interlocutory applications, if any pending stands closed (Dictated to PS, transcribed by her, corrected, signed and pronounced by me in Open Court, on this the 19th day of February, 2024)

Sd/- (GANAPATHI K.R.K) PRESIDING OFFICER

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead