Debts Recovery Tribunals and Appellate Tribunals
NAZ TRADING COMPANY THROUGH ITS PROPRIETOR vs PRATHAMA BANK on 16 March 2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
**ORDER-SHEET**Page No. ....**DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL, DEHRADUN****M.A. No. 16 of 2026****M/s Naz Trading Company Ltd. Vs Prathama UP Gramin Bank****Date: 16.03.2026**
Item No.06
Present: Ld. Counsel for the Applicant.
Called out, Ld. Counsel for the Applicant present.
The petition has been filed by the applicant for recall of the order dated 01.01.2025 after a period of more than one year and this miscellaneous application is also not maintainable on the grounds mentioned in this petition.
The previous securitization application was decided on 01.01.2025 and order under section 14 of the S.A.R.F.A.E.S.I. Act, 2002 has been passed by Ld. Additional District Magistrate, Concerned on 14.01.2026 i.e. more than after one year. The situation has shown that the Respondent Bank has taken action when compelled by the applicant for obtaining order under section 14 of S.A.R.F.A.E.S.I. Act otherwise the applicant could have been repaid the borrowed money, the order submitted by the applicant as annexure A-2 passed by Ld. ADM concerned is also not readable, the situation is very serious for judicial and semi-judicial system, the said practice is not adopting only by borrowers also adopting by the secured creditor in regular manner and none is ready to submit documents in appropriate manner after requesting several times by the Tribunal.
The petition is not allowable and liable to be dismissed. Hence, dismissed in limine.
All interim applications are also disposed off accordingly.
Office is directed not to receive any documents, if not readable properly.
Ld. Registrar is also directed to issue a public notice that no any litigants or Ld. Counsel shall submit any documents which is not readable, if the said situation shall find out in future Ld. Counsel concerned shall be responsible for the same.
Record be consigned.
(Umesh Kumar Sharma) Presiding Officer DRT, Dehradun