Debts Recovery Tribunals and Appellate Tribunals

MOHD GULFAM QURESHI vs UNION BANK OF INDIA on 29 April 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

**ORDER-SHEET** Page No. ....

**DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL, DEHRADUN**

**Appeal diary No. 440 of 2026**

**Mohd. Gulfam Qureshi Vs Union Bank of India**

**Dated: 29.04.2026**

Item No.08

Present: Mohd. Gulfam Qureshi, Appellant in person Sh. Vijay Bhushan Pandey, Ld. Counsel for Appellant Sh. Sudhir Sharma, Ld. Counsel for Respondent Bank Sh. Praveen Kumar Gupta, Ld. Chief Manager of Respondent Bank Called out, Ld. Counsel for the parties present. Appellant in person present. Ld. Chief Manager of Respondent Bank in person present.

This Appeal has been filed by the Appellant against order dated 23.04.2026. Even though there is a provision for filing Appeal under Section 30(A) that such Appeal shall not be entertained by the Tribunal unless such person has deposited 50% of amount of debt due as determined by the Tribunal. But after filing the Appeal, at the time of hearing, Ld. Counsel for Appellant has prayed only for providing time in relation to repayment of awarded amount and the Appellant is ready to repay whole of the amount of awarded amount within a period of six months finally and not pressed order passed by Ld. Recovery Officer.

The Appellant has submitted a demand draft of Rs.5.00Lacs(Rupees Five Lacs only DD No.344502 dated 29.04.2026 of Yes Bank in the name of Recovery Officer Tribunal Dehradun.

Ld. Recovery Officer shall make endorsement in favour of Respondent Bank on the demand draft. The demand draft is of Yes Bank, the concerned authority of Yes Bank is also directed to clear the said demand draft when produced by the respondent bank in favour of respondent bank, as the demand draft in question is provided by the Appellant for repayment of borrowed money.

The Appellant is also ready to repay Rs.15.00Lacs(Rupees Fifteen Lacs only) by 05.05.2026 to the respondent bank after that Appellant shall repay Rs.20.00Lacs(Rupees Twenty Lacs only) on 5<sup>th</sup> Day of each month in June, July, August, September and October of 2026 minimum and lastly whole of the rest amount with expenses on 05.11.2026 in relation to repayment of award passed by this Tribunal in O.A. No. 249/2024 Union Bank of India Vs. M/s New Doon Darbar and & Ors. dated 10.10.2024 on the basis of said award, the Recovery Certificate **ORDER-SHEET**Page No. ....**DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL, DEHRADUN****Appeal diary No. 440 of 2026****Mohd. Gulfam Qureshi Vs Union Bank of India**

was issued as R.C. No. 350 of 2024 Union Bank of India Vs. M/s New Doon Darbar & Ors for an amount of Rs.1,40,31,625.65ps with simple interest @11% from the date of filing of OA i.e. 01.04.2024.

In case of committing any default at any stage on the part of Appellant/Debt Holder, the Respondent Bank/Certificate Holder shall be entitled to take action for recovery in accordance with law.

So, the Appellant is directed be aware about repayment of awarded amount as directed by this order as the ample opportunity is provided to the Appellant/Debt Holder by this order also for repayment of awarded amount/borrowed money.

This order shall not come in the way of settlement, if the parties want to settle the matter amicably at any stage, may settle.

The respondent bank shall also provide total amount due against the Appellant/Debt Holder in detail as per award within a period of 30 days from today and it shall also be expedient for the Appellant to pay the amount more than Rs.20.00Lacs as installment if possible. The said situation shall also be fruitful for the Appellant.

If the Appellant/Debt Holders shall repay the amount awarded by this Tribunal in the said manner as mentioned above in this order, the respondent bank shall not take any coercive action in relation to physical possession or auction sale through SARFAESI action or Recovery Certificate proceedings in the light of above order. The Ld. Recovery Officer shall not proceed further.

A Copy of this order be sent to Ld. Recovery Officer concerned for information and appropriate action.

In the light of above observations, the Appeal is disposed off accordingly.

Interim order, if any vacated. All Interim Applications are disposed off in the light of above.

No order as to cost.

Record be consigned.

(Umesh Kumar Sharma) Presiding Officer DRT, Dehradun

29.04.2026

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead